This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Needs proper organising and splitting up into relevant sub-sections to make it easier to read. Could also do with pictures. Does read as Eleutherius' auggests - any reasons as to why Brocach seeing as your behind the article and addition of wikilinks to many articles? Mabuska(talk)14:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
It already has lede plus two sections, which seems to me to be about standard for articles of this length. Not sure that much is to be gained by breaking it into bite-size chunks, nor that public domain pictures illustrating the work of a lobbying organisation can easily be located. However, it is still a very young article and I am sure that it will improve over time as others contribute. Brocach (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It appears that many of the in-line citations for the Activities section simply link to the Wikipedia page of the cited source and provide no other information, such as the title of the article. I would encourage the editor who added those citations to add more information. Moonboy54 (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
