Talk:Calgary Police Service
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Calgary Police Service Pipe Band was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 November 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Calgary Police Service. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Untitled
editThis article is short and awful... someone needs to update it.
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. - Qyd 03:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Anyone care to add a 'Critisism' section of the CPS? As a resident in Calgary, I have noticed quite a few shortcomings. Arrogance, agression and abuse of power being just a few issues when dealing with the (hopefully) minority of constables. What with all the hoo-ha of the Vancouver RCMP killing that poor Polish guy at the airport by tasering him a while back, I guess its relvant.
Adding critisism would be suspect of having a second agenda or Anti-Social political views. There would be no NPOV in any of it.Twhanna (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Anyone with articles or news stories we could pad this out with? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.58.185 (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
HAWC1
editJust so everyone knows, I've just finished fixing references that state that HAWC1 is a Eurocopter EC120. Simply put, it's not. It is an MD Helicopters MD 520N, a NOTAR design. This is glaringly obvious, as HAWC2 has a clearly visible tail rotor, while HAWC1 does not.
Feel free to dispute me on this.