Talk:California's 1st senatorial district

Requested move 17 January 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 15:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


– Per WP:CONCISE and WP:LOWERCASE, similar to California's 1st congressional district. This still satisfies Fluffy89502's point regarding the state constitution's naming convention (Article IV, Section 6). Basically, my outlook is that either (A) Foo's nth State Senate district or (B) Foo's nth senatorial distrct is fine, but (C) Foo's nth State Senatorial district is cumbersome and wordy.

By that logic, I don't think there's any need to change the Assembly district pages (e.g. California's 1st State Assembly district) since those contain the unmodified phrase "State Assembly" in them. Woko Sapien (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 00:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note that this change would make California Senate districts identical to how Ohio Senate districts are formatted. --Woko Sapien (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Elections and Referendums has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject California has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.