Talk:Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 161.73.253.41 in topic Addition

I would argue that the "Opposition to Campsfield House" section is lacking in NPOV. Any suggestions? -- User:Voyelles

This entry is out of date as the management is now MITIE. See http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/aboutus/organisation/immigrationremovalcentres/campsfield Putt1ck (talk) 08:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The existing text is hopelessly out of date and utterly lacks NPOV, amounting to a platform for those who oppose immigration control, or at least, NIMBY. Their views should be reported of course but they represent a tiny proportion of the general population, as the 2010 Witney Election result so clearly shows. I have updated with the most recent full inspection report which gives a most positive assessment of the place, also the outcome of investigation of the arson attack on the establishment.Unraed (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)unraedReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Campsfield House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Addition

edit

I suggest that information about the possible re-opening of the camp is included, following comments from the government

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y87yp75ego https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977qqer84go 161.73.253.41 (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply