Talk:Cardiotocography

Additions/new article

I could not find any article regarding STAN on wikipedia. STAN is an acronym for ST-analysis and is the addition of ST-segment analysis to the standard CTG recording. This has shown to be a better and more precise method than CTG alone, and is now in widespread use. Could someone write an article on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.165.75.134 (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge

This article should be merged with Cardiotocograph and possibly also with Nonstress test. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The article has since been merged with nonstress test, but the merger between Cardiotocograph and Cardiotocography still needs to be done. Are there any preferences for the title of the merged article? Looking at analogous medical articles (mostly in Category:Medical imaging), articles seem to favor using -graphy over -graph or -gram (though an exception is electrocardiogram - which should probably be moved to electrocardiography). --Scott Alter 02:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Nonstress test is still posted as a separate article. Maybe a redirect is needed? Biolprof (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

• Cardiotocograph is now redirected to this article. Nonstress test does not need to be merged or redirected as it is distinct diagnostic test. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 03:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Refs

This article currently has no refs. One good ref is (Mires, G.; Williams, F.; Howie, P. (2001). "Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population". BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 322 (7300): 1457–1460, discussion 1460–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457. PMC 32308. PMID 11408301.) re cardiotocography vs Doppler auscultation. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

copyvio

The tone is wrong and some seems to be from [1]. 87.83.31.234 (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Reassuring and non-reassuring

You say: proposed terminology of a three-tiered system to replace the older undefined terms "reassuring" and "nonreassuring" Sure.. but you should mention what reassuring and nonreassuring is Remember this is just a PROPOSAL 182.255.99.214 (talk) 09:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cardiotocography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727153519/http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/use-electronic-fetal-monitoring to http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/use-electronic-fetal-monitoring
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129220647/http://sogc.org/guidelines/documents/gui197CPG0709r.pdf to http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/documents/gui197CPG0709r.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

AI methods?

IntelligentAgent300 has added (and then re-added after reversion) a section about an innovative AI method for cardiotocography interpretation. I argue that this section, being based on a method proposed by a single author in a text book chapter, with no evidence that the method has been implemented and proven in practice, is speculative at best and does not yet merit inclusion in this article. See WP:MEDRS for a discussion of reliable sources on medical information. I invite IntelligentAgent300 to discuss this matter. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)