Talk:Carl von In der Maur

Carl von In der Maur has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 13, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 11, 2023.

Biography: Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Microstates: Liechtenstein Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Liechtenstein (assessed as High-importance).

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

-Indy beetle (talk) 01:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

[5]

- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Works by Carl von In der Maur

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[6]
[7]

-- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carl von In der Maur/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 14:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this in the next couple of days. auntieruth (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Questionable GA review

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I may just be overreacting, and the article might be fine, but I find a lack of any commentary concerning and and frankly inappropriate. It appears the "reviewing" was done without any recording of doing so, and the passing of the article demonstrating that it needed no further work. At the very least, that could have been made clear, but no evidence of that has been offered. I would just do it myself but I am not knowledgeable in the content area. mftp dan ^oops 23:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic