Talk:Carlton Fisk

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

(paraphrased here to remove an obscenity)?

edit

What kind of excuse is that? Wikipedia has articles on every swear and taboo topic. Removing what he said because of an obscenity is rather rediculous. IceDrake523 04:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation page

edit

What about Carlton Fisk the Wu-Tang Clan member? How about a disambiguation page?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.28.71 (talk) 08:29, 5 December 2006

Interleague play

edit

I'm sorry, but there was no such thing as "interleague" play in 1975. This really needs to be cleaned up, because I assure that there was no naming ceremony for "The Pole" during an interleague series 22 years before interleague play was instituted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.64.226 (talk) 19:24, 5 July 2007

What is with the colors?

edit

Why do we have a nice picture of carlton in his Boston Uniform while the coloring for the stats is white sox. it should be all boston or all Chisox with a pic of him in as a White sox. or go nuetral with solid white —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.114.13.255 (talk) 03:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Carltonfisk.png

edit
 

Image:Carltonfisk.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unusual number?

edit

From the article: "At that time, his old number 27 was held on the White Sox by pitcher Ken Kravec. Fisk flip-flopped his old number and thus wore the unusual baseball number of 72 on his jersey."

Why is 72 an unusual baseball number? A minor point, but one I am quite curious about. The Mink Ermine Fox (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think if someone were to research the people who have worn any given uniform number in baseball history, you would find that numbers much above 50 are quite rare. The first numbers to be worn reflected the number of the person's order in the line up (Babe Ruth #3, Lou Gehrig #4, etc), so most ball players wore lower numbers. LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Missing citations

edit

It could be argued that two valid citations should be located and affixed to this sentence from the start of the article: "Fisk is best known for 'waving fair' his game-winning home run in the 12th inning of Game 6 of the 1975 World Series, one of the greatest moments in World Series history." It could also be argued, in the alternative, that the salient points made within the sentence (i.e.: Fisk's being best known for the Game 6 walk-off home run and that moment's rarefied place in World Series history) are self-evident to everyone knowledgeable about modern-era baseball. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swantamer (talkcontribs) 14:25, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


Film reference

edit

Is it worth mentioning in the article that Fisk's home run in Game 6 of the 1975 World Series is used as a plot point in the film Good Will Hunting? The character played by Robin Williams explains to the Matt Damon character that he had a ticket for the game, but with some friends in a bar before the game he saw a woman he liked and handed his ticket over to someone else so that he could stay in the bar with her. As a result, he missed Fisk's home run bouncing off the pole, and the subsequent pitch invasion but instead married the girl. Cottonshirtτ 08:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notable feuds

edit

I was planning to take this subsection out of the article, in much the same way that we avoid "controversies" sections in other entries. I don't see anything that suggests that Fisk was any more prone to feuds than other well-known baseball players. I think his issues with Thurman Munson could be just as easily covered within other sections of the article. I was surprised that his long-running issues with CWS management weren't covered there, but they are easily discussed elsewhere. I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't missing something before I got rid of this section. EricEnfermero (Talk) 21:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carlton Fisk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply