Talk:Caslon Type Foundry

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Slab-serif type sold by the Caslon foundry in 1841

• ... that the Caslon Type Foundry made metal type (example pictured) in London for over two hundred years? Source: Neil MacMillan, A-Z of Type Designers, "opened in London's Vine Street probably in 1722 or 1723...remained in existence until 1937", Reed/Johnson (registration required) "in 1730...he had already eclipsed most of his competitors".
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Moylough Belt-Shrine

Created by Blythwood (talk). Self-nominated at 20:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article and well sourced. New enough, long enough. I'd say good to go. Copyvio unlikely Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

• @Blythwood: hi there! couple questions about the sourcing:
  • The type did not become popular. does the ref in the o cite the back half of that passage?
  • Where are the example pages cited to?
  • Ditto for the quote that begins Feeling, naturally, regret that the honoured and historical name of "Caslon" should die out...
• Sorry about that, we'll get this promoted in a jiffy once this is cleared up. Thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 23:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Theleekycauldron, that's fine! In order:
    • Yes, I've added an extra citation position to make that clearer
    • I've added an extra citation for the sample pages from the 1841 specimen
    • Yes, that's not clear. I've added an extra source position and found a 1923 article on Google Books that also quotes it as an online source.
  • Hope that fixes the problems! Blythwood (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
    • that's perfect, thanks so much! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 04:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

• Theleekycauldron, no worries, thanks for being so attentive! Blythwood (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

---

Promoting to Prep 1, without the image (as there is much competition for the image slot. By my count, out of the 107 verified nominations, around 40 have images. Only 1 of 8 nominations can have image. So, only around 13-14 would be given the image slot) – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)