Talk:Cassia fistula
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Whole page copy-pasted
editAbout 90% of this page seems to be copy-pasted from "http://www.4to40.com/ayurveda/index.asp?p=Cassia_Fistula&c=Herbs&k=Ahala_Kanuwa". Should probably be deleted ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PseudoscienceFTL (talk • contribs) 02:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Good eye, but this seems to be a case of a backwards copy, since the external link is remarkable similar to a version of the article from 2007, which was built up slowly and not copied and pasted wholesale by a meticulous editor (see the link and surrounding edits). Rkitko (talk) 03:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Some references & seeds NOT poisonous
editJust removed a sentence stating that the "seeds are poisonous" that were reference to an Ayurveda site that in turn stated several things about the tree without any sources. Did not seem like a trusted source. Moreover, other references pasted below (that could be useful in the article if somebody drops by) clearly indicate that the seeds, contrary to being poisonous have nutritive and medicinal properties. Hence removed.
- This section from Plant resources from tropical Africa.
- This article PDF
- And this article on its constituents
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cassia fistula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307101819/http://www.kerenvis.nic.in/isbeid/kerala-symbols.htm to http://www.kerenvis.nic.in/isbeid/kerala-symbols.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cassia fistula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714110438/http://www.4to40.com/ayurveda/index.asp?p=Cassia_Fistula&c=Herbs&k=Ahala_Kanuwa to http://www.4to40.com/ayurveda/index.asp?p=Cassia_Fistula&c=Herbs&k=Ahala_Kanuwa
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Species as national symbol
editI have consolidated text about national symbolism of the tree and its flowers to the Culture section, where previously it was in both the lede and that section. The section currently lists Thailand, India (Kerala), Sri Lanka and Laos as countries where the species has symbolic significance. A number of previous edits, which mentioned a single location in the lede, appeared to be WP:UNDUE. Declangi (talk) 23:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
I would assume it is true because of its heavy usage in the Buddhacārita of Aśvaghosa where it comes up multiple times. At one point in the fifth canto (verse 6), the prince Siddhartha sitting atop his horse is described as resembling the karṇikāra (druma-abja-ketu) flower:
नवरुक्मखलीनकिङ्किणीकं प्रचलच्चामरचारुहेमभाण्डम् । अभिरुह्य स कन्थकं सदश्वं प्रययौ केतुमिव द्रुमाब्जकेतुः ॥ ३ ॥
“New small golden ornamental bells adorned the bridle bit, (along with) golden ornamented trappings of beautifully swaying chowries // Having mounted the lustrous good horse Kanthaka, [he appeared] like a karṇikāra flower” 5.6 Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 21:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Some information is repetitive throughout the page
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have removed and moved some of the repeated information within the abstract paragraph and the Culture section. I found that the medical appliance of the Cassia fistula as a pimple paste to based of commercial purposes so I removed the part which is irrelevant and not enough research or studies to support the arguments. -CattleyaOr (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)