Talk:Cat/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Archive

This page has been archived here as a result of this vote. To revitalize a discussion, copy all of the text (formatting included) to Talk:Cat --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 00:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Tree Climbing

I am astonished that there is so little mention of the cat's ability to climb trees in this article. There is also a reference (when talking about cat colonies) about cats having little protection from other predators, such as dogs. This, of course is not true. Cats *will* climb trees, their claws are quite suited for it, and it is an excellent escape mechanism. This is noted earlier in the article, so why the claims that cats have a hard time escaping from predators?

They are quite apt at this (although cats that are kept indoors most of their lives are not). It should be mentioned, somewhere, and perhaps with images (I wish I could help in this article with images of this, but I have no cat.. owned or to borrow ;). Clearly it was a means for the wild cat to escape, and again.. the domesticated cat will often do the same if severely threatened. Further, this is likely the reason why a cat has developed a means to right itself during a fall. Trees are a place a cat can fall from.

As well, cats will often climb trees and consume the young of a nested bird. They certainly do not only hunt on the ground, but also pay attention to bird activity, and take advantage of discovered nests. I have watched this behaviour myself, many times. This would be worth noting..

Image:Mackerel tabby.jpg

This pic has some serious image problems. It needs to be removed --Fir0002 www 06:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

What are the problems you see with the image? It looks appropriate to me. --Ramdrake 13:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh I'm not disputing it's appropriateness, I'm just saying that the image quality is atrocious. Over exposure, blurring, severe chromatic abberation, noise, low image res and a poor choice of background make it an extremely poor image; especially when considering the vast amount of photos there must be on shot a common subject. Have a quick look on flickr if there's nothing much on the commons: [1] --Fir0002 www 10:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

The image does have image problems, and it should be removed --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 22:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Just toss it already, there are plenty of images in the article. No need to wait for replacements and a vote is overkill for a decission like this, not to mention Wikipedia is WP:NOT a democracy! It also seems to me there is an intrinsic problem with cat pictures. Many people have one, think its cute, make a quick snap and upload it. If you are looking for better pictures: There gotta be cats around Swifts Creek, wink wink :-) --Dschwen 07:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, I'll see what I can do! I've got a couple of pix already: Image:Cat03.jpg, Image:Cat02.jpg, Image:cat_cleaning_itself.jpg, Image:cat_cleaning_itself02.jpg --Fir0002 www 07:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I absolutely don't agree. Tabby patterns are a very important part of cat coat patterns. If we are to remove the image, then replace it with another example. Besides, when reduced to fit the page, the flaws you see in it aren't as visible. --Ramdrake 12:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Besides, I looked at the other images on that page, and several of them also have big problems. However, they illustrate the point of the article well, despite their errors. I'm putting it back. If it is to be taken out again, please have a proper discussion about it, leaving the subject open long enough for people to discuss it and then all can take a proper decision. --Ramdrake 12:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. I will remove it. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 08:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

What about Image:Domestic_cat.jpg or Image:Koscat2.jpg? Or some of the images from Tabby, like Image:Tabby-cat.jpg? FreplySpang (talk) 14:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Right. I was bold and swapped in Image:Koscat2.jpg. Domestic_cat.jpg is a better picture, but I think koscat2 works better as a thumbnail, and displays the markings more clearly. FreplySpang (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Actually, none of them has as nice a view of the body coat illustrating a tabby pattern. The image quality may not be that great, but the illustative quality of the image is remarkable. Few images of tabby cats show the body pattern in such detail. --Ramdrake 14:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree that Image:Mackerel tabby.jpg does show the best detail of the body pattern, but I'm not sure that we need that level of detail here. For me, the washed-out face makes the cat look odd enough that it detracts from the overall picture. Also, we do have a separate article about Tabby cats - maybe it would work best to have a nicer overall-cat picture here, and put Image:Mackerel tabby.jpg there to show off the specifics of the pattern? FreplySpang (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Looking at the image you swapped the mackerel for, I'M finding that I can easily live with it. It doesn't have the clinical view of the other, but it is quite good enough an example. --Ramdrake 14:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Good, because we're about to fall off the right-hand edge of the talk page! :-) FreplySpang (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, look, I found the reverse switch! ==ILike2BeAnonymous 18:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Bicolour

This has become rather ludicrous. The only point I was attempting to make was that tuxedo cats are somtimes known as black-and-white cats, but, as Ramdrake pointed out, this picture is about a bicolor cat, and, as such, there should be no text stating 'otherwise known as a tuxedo cat' (as it did originally), or anything else. Therefore, if there are no objections within the next 24 hours, I will remove the bracketed text (and, of course, the brackets!!) leaving the picture to simply state: A Bicolor cat. Sergeant Snopake 21:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind, especially since the different types of bicolours are already mentioned in the text. Didn't mean to start a war there... Sorry! --Ramdrake 23:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Nor did I. You have my sincerest apology. Sergeant Snopake 21:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Semiprotection

Currently, the edit properties are: [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]. I think we should change it to [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]. We should do move=sysop, because why would any user move the cat article unless some scientist somewhere decided that cats would be called something else. And even if that happens, someone should just get an admin to move it. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 23:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Seems to me that there isn't a need for that. It's not causing any problems. If it's not broke why fix it? OmnipotentEntity 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Calico Picture

Wouldn't the "calico" picture more correctly be labeled a tortiseshell or tortiseshell-and-white? My understanding, backed by the calico entry is that calico's are primarily white, while tortiseshell's are primarily black. This one has white paws, so perhaps it's a tortiseshell-and-white? Maybe a pciture of a more classic calico (mostly white) or a more classic tortiseshell (no white) would be best? I know this isn't a matter of life or death.  :) Lucky Adrastus 06:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalisation

Can someone explain to me what can be put on this page that would be considered vandalism? They're housepets! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.33.228.198 (talk • contribs)

I don't know why someone would want to vandal this page. Most of the vandalism is just nonsense, and it needs to stop. Immediately. Vandalism is wrong and it only brings down Wikipedia's quality. If you want to view the vandalism, go to the history. SilentWind 19:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)SilentWind

Black-and-White

Are black-and-white cats extra crabby? My family has had seven cats in all (two have died), and the only ones that were ever nasty were our black-and-whites - bare in mind that three of our cats (tabbies) were wild before we got them, and the vet thought that they would never be tame. Our first black-and-white was very nice when he was young, then when he was middle aged he became very nasty. By the time he got to about fifteen, he'd gone completely senile, and spent his remaining two years being nice again. Our second black-and-white is so bad that the vet said we had to give him two days notice before we bring her in, so that he can get out of the country. You can imagine what sort of cat she is. The vet also told me that they had never seen a nasty ginger or tabby cat, but they had seen nasty black-and-whites. Have I just been unlucky with my black-and-whites, or is this a trait that many carry? Sergeant Snopake 18:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Never seen anything about balck-and-whites being "extra crabby", although I've see references to ginger cats. I've been told male gingers are "extra social and athletic" and and female ginger "very bossy". I have several of both, and can testify to the veracity of this. :) --Ramdrake 19:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

BTW, my vet isn't just inexperienced, she meant a ginger/tabby cat that was as nasty as our black-and-white female. She'd never known a cat seriously try to kill her like our B&W did. Sergeant Snopake 23:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Cats as a human food source?

Should any mention be made (either here or in a separate article) of people eating cats? Horses and dogs both have such a section and I don't see why cats (who have given mankind far fewer contributions than the aforementioned species) should be treated better. 66.133.180.56 03:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Far fewer contributions? They keep pests out of food supplies. I'd say food is pretty important. Lib3rtine 20:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, so long as someone can provide verifiable information and not just speculation or inneundo ("Duh, I heard that they cook cats over in Chinatown). ==ILike2BeAnonymous 06:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

kind of cats —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.186.161 (talk • contribs)

Of course, it could go in the article under the heading "Urban Legends about Cats;" not only cats in insert-your-own-ethnic-group-you-want-to-insult cuisine, but cats stealing the breath from babies and/or smothering them, etc. On the other hand, I did read an article here just recently that said the government of Vietnam was officially discouraging the eating of cats and snakes, as the rat problem caused by these practices are getting out of hand. I can't offer the article as collaborating evidence, but I'll look into it.

Actually, the "urban legend" about cats sucking breath is relatively founded. Cats are attracted by warmth, and anyone who has held a baby can tell you how warm they are. The cat would crawl in the crib to sleep with the super warm baby, and when the baby would die of SIDS or something like that, the cat would be blamed because it was the only thing near the baby at the time of death. --Allie 04:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/catsuck.htm --DrBat 21:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, yes, the cats were blamed, but they didn't actually steal the baby's breath--they just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The idea of them stealing the baby's breath is an urban legend, just one that has circumstantial evidence surrounding it. I came across a recent article on Reuters about animal rights activists in China trying to shut down restaurants serving dog and cat meat. The article was from Reuters.com: "Animal rights protest shuts restaurant," Monday, June 19, 2006 2:16 AM ET. (I realize that's not proper citation format, but hopefully it's good enough for now.) The article states, "Many Chinese, particularly in the south, believe eating dogs and cats are good warming foods to eat during the winter." Not undeniable proof, of course, but a bit better than, "This one time, a friend of my friend Bob..."--Raulpascal 17:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I remember seeing a television documentary once where it was shown that some Australian Aborigines hunt and eat feral cats, which is closer to verifiability than "This one time, a friend of my friend Bob..." but still not sourced well enough for Wikipedia since I can't remember what show it was. User:Angr 07:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

References

We need a serious effort to get some inline references here that are NOT web pages, as that seems to be the vast majority of things cited. Cats are not an obscure topic, so I'll get my vet books out and anyone else with printed matter, feel free to help add some more concrete refs. pschemp | talk 21:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

cat food

"However, the majority of brand-name cat foods are primarily grain based, often containing large amounts of corn or rice and supplemented with meats and minerals and vitamins." i'm guessing this only applies to dried cat food not the tinned stuff which certainly appears to contain big chunks of meat to me, anyone care to confirm? Plugwash 18:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the tinned stuff has pretty much the same composition as the dry stuff, plus of course something like 50-70% water added. Just go to the site of one of those major brands, and they should list the ingredients for both the dry and the canned stuff (assuming the company you check has both lines). --Ramdrake 18:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Ulysses Refrence

As fun as it is to stick Ulysses refrences into everything, it does provide interpretive dispute. The cat in the begining of Chapter 4 of Ulysses is not annoyed. Bloom may be becoming slightly annoyed, but the cat is purring and asking for affection. The onomatopoeia "Mrkgnao" is the sound a cat makes that is between a purr and a meow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloomingdedalus (talk • contribs) 22:43, 8 June 2006

Deleted Picture

This picture

was deleted from the article "Cat". I feel it is a good example of an american shorthair. It should be placed back into the article but I didn't just put it back in case anyone wanted to add a comment to why it is not worthy of being in the article.

One of the questions to answer is, how many images should go in an article. It is already very heavy due to a large number of images, so I would say, what is the added value of this image weighted against making the page even heavier? -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 19:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps even more important, why was this picture deleted and another one put in its place, which to me has no obviously superior value to the one that was deleted? I agree that there are a lot of images in this article, and there are a number of pictures one would like to include but can't. --Ramdrake 20:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree that there's already too many pictures in this article. Is it really necessary to include a picture of a cat litter box? Seriously, who doesn't know what a cat litter box looks like? I'll go and remove it. Dionyseus 20:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

cat pictures

http://flickr.com/search/?q=kitty+or+cat+or+puss&m=tags&s=int lots of original cat pictures.

Janes

I've never heard a female cat called a "queen", but I have heard them called "Janes" BethEnd 03:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC).

It's a common enough calling among cat breeders. --Ramdrake 16:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Move of cat communication

Anybody have thoughts on the move of the cat communication section to its own page (notwithstanding the fact it messes up this page's references and the cat communication page has no reference at the foot of the page while having blind references in the text).

Indoor Outdoor Cats

“Domestic cats tend to live longer if they are not permitted to go outdoors…” - In the UK only show cats are kept locked up indoors. My parents kept three cats and sometimes their cats would spend two or three nights in a row outside, particularly in the summer. All three cats lived more than ten years, one of the cats lived twenty-one years.

Most people in the UK view keeping cats indoors, not letting them roam outside independently, as terribly cruel! Of course, if you live in a high rise flat keeping a cat indoors is unavoidable though the cats should be exercised regularly outside on a lead.

As for road traffic, aren't there more roads per square kilometre in the UK than in America? The last time I looked Britain was an overcrowded island and far more urban than the vast empty plains of the United States? I can't believe British cats are any better road crossers than American cats. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.41.213.239 (talk • contribs) .

Why is it that in the UK only show cats are kept indoors? Is it because the British people think show cats are more important than non-show cats and that it is not safe enough outside for their precious show cats? Just because your parent's three cats were able to live for over 10 years doesn't mean that the average life of outdoor cats isn't shorter than it is for indoor cats. You say that sometimes their three cats would stay outside for three days, your parent's cats must have survived on local wildlife such as small birds, which means the potential that it ingested parasites and diseases is huge. So not only were your parents endagering the life of their cats, they were making hell for the local wildlife. Local dogs and predators are also a threat to cats. Also an outside cat can become infected by an FIV cat. Of course there's also the flea and tick problems. It's far too dangerous outside for cats, be kind to them and to the local wildlife by keeping your cat indoors. Dionyseus 21:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Cats are very independent creatures and cannot easily enjoy a quality of life without getting into a few scrapes. Any minor blemish on a show cat’s coat could prevent that cat from winning a competition To be frank I think keeping and breeding cats for show is cruel anyway. Cats are not made to be wrapped up in cotton wool they are living animals. . Most people in Britain let their pet cats play independently outside and there are not piles of dead cats lying on roadsides or packs of dogs wondering our cities at night feasting on cats that happen to be outside.

As for ticks and fleas there, have you never heard of flea and tick powder?

It is true that cats hunt the local wildlife but unless you live somewhere, such as Australia, where the local wildlife is in endanger of extinction from cat predation I don’t see the problem, the natural world is a very, very cruel place, after all. Wild animals are murdering each other all the time. Anyhow the local wildlife in most cities in Britain and cities in the rest of the world is hardly in a natural state or in balance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.213.239 (talk • contribs)

"Just because your parent's three cats were able to live for over 10 years doesn't mean that the average life of outdoor cats isn't shorter than it is for indoor cats."

Isn't declawing common in the USA? i imagine a declawed cat would have a much higher chance of getting killed outside dragging down the average. Has anyone ever done any studies on this? Plugwash 00:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Many, many studies have been done on this by veterinarians. I will hunt up the references but don't have them right now. The fact is that there are far less dangers to a cat that lives indoors than to one that spends part or most of its time outdoors. Cats that are raised indoors prefer it, it is not cruel to keep them inside, instead it is a matter of how they were raised. Since you have admitted that keeping cats for show is "cruel", it is clear where your biases lay. Cats have different personalities, and some cats enjoy doing that. Some cats prefer the indoors and won't go outdoors. There is nothing wrong with people who want to protect the welfare of their animals. Yes the world is a cruel place, but the logic in making it easier for your pet to be killed is flawed. pschemp | talk 00:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

To Plugwash, declawing is an awful thing to do to a cat and thankfully some communities have started banning it here in the United States [2], but it is not the only reason why cats don't belong outside. I've already given many reasons as to why cats shouldn't be allowed outside, please see my reasons a few paragraphs up. Dionyseus 01:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, I fail to understand by which twist of logic people accept that dogs should be kept indoors (considering one's enclosed backyard as "indoors") and walked a few times a day, and tend on the other hand to consider it alright to let a cat wander without supervision. Cats and dogs are both social animals and enjoy the company of humans (cats are social animals too - they're just solitary hunters as opposed to dogs who are pack hunters). Cats need to be kept indoors just as much as dogs. But that's just my two cents' worth. --Ramdrake 13:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Despite the seemingly quite bitter dispute above, I was pleased to find the article itself was free from any wild acusations supporting or debunking either side. Well done! I came across a good debate on these issues a while back, from a cat magizine. If I remember their locations, I shall return to suggest their inclusion. The main difference seems to lie in the difference in US and European habits, which is normally atributed to the greater presense of natural preditors in the USA. LinaMishima 19:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Cat's Lifespan

How long can a cat live fully? My Aunt and Uncle has a cat who is 19 years old!

Almost 20 here. ==ILike2BeAnonymous 18:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks but that's not what this page is for. Please keep trivia like that off of the talk page. pschemp | talk 20:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Average is 15-20 years, depending on health and environment (neutered cats live longer, domestic cats live longer, etc.). I'll try and find a definitive source for that. Zerbey 23:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Domestication of the cat

I'm getting a bit tired of seeing the phrase "because the domestication of the cat is fairly recent", as the cat was one the the first three or four domesticated animals. One wouldn't refer to the horse as a "recently domesticated animal", but it was domesticated several (roughly four) millenia after the cat. The cat does retain some atavistic predatory behavior, but this doesn't mean it is any less of a "domestic" animal. --Ramdrake 23:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Kittens

Does anyone know how often it is that a mother will have just one kitten in a litter? Sergeant Snopake 15:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

It's relatively rare(<10%), depends on the mother's size and age, and unfortunately is off-topic for this talk page. --Ramdrake 15:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Seems a perfectly reasonable place to ask to me. We do encourage people to ask about subjects at their talk pages - see Template:RD3 which is used to direct people who ask knowledge questions at the Help desk. (Couldn't answer the question better than Ramdrake, though I did stumble across the useful advice that if only one kitten comes out, and the mother has had bigger litters in the past, you should check that more aren't stuck.) --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Fine if it is, but I was told over and over that article talk pages were meant for discussing improvements to the article, and not a general discussion forum (please see the Evolution page for an example - that one comes up there often enough). I don't mind being wrong.--Ramdrake 15:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I think it comes down to the difference between a knowledge question (like Sergeant's) and a question intended to provoke discussion, as in "aren't cats awesome?" The first aren't as prone to provoke extended and irrelevant discussion as the second - and they can turn up areas that the article doesn't currently cover but could. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't mean to cause controversy! I just wasn't sure where else to ask. Sergeant Snopake 15:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Collarbones?

The article contains the following sentence:

The domestic cat is one of the few four-legged animals that do not possess rigid collarbones [3].

I removed this sentence (as dubious) but I was reverted by Ramdrake. My wife is a PHD in anatomy, and according to her and a colleague of hers who specializes in comparative anatomy, the cat does have a small thin clavicle (i.e. collarbone), as do most (all?) other four-legged animals. The supplied links simply says:

"But we have something cats don't: rigid collarbones.

The link doesn't say anything about other four-legged animals, so I'm wondering whether this is actually true. And while the link does say that cats do not have "rigid collarbones", it is unclear to me if that is supposed to mean that cats have no collarbones at all (since I assume all bones are rigid) or simply that cats have collarbones that are non-rigid. This needs to be cleared up, with appropriate citations.

Paul August ☎ 21:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I should be looking for a better citation. You're right that the point is that cats don't have rigid collarbones, in the sense of a full shoulder girdle. The absence of a full shoulder girdle gives added flexibility to a cat, allowing him to fit through an opening about the size of its head (try doing that yourself -- obviously you can't).

I'll be looking for a better citation, but if you find one in the meantime, please go right ahead and integrate it. --Ramdrake 12:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Section on overpopulation

Sorry if I did a blanket revert of the addition the first time, but the initial wording was:

1)misleading as the only way to get that incredibly high number of cats was if all offsprings survived to 7 years of age as a minimum. While cats that are cared for can easily live up to 12-15 years (and even beyond), it is estimated the average lifespan of a feral cat is about 2-3 years (not counting perinatal mortalilty!), and

2)offensive as it implied that everyone and anyone breeding animals was contributing to pet overpopulation. I am a cat breeder in my community, and I ensure that all my kittens are placed in good homes. I keep control of how many litters of kittens my queens give birth to in any given year. Also, my cats never go outdoors (and they don't miss it a bit), so they don't contribute to increasing the population of feral cats in any way, shape or form. --Ramdrake 00:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Laser pointers?

Does anyone have a citation that supports the discussion on laser pointers? The sentence "the fact that the cat cannot physically touch the laser dot no matter how hard it tries and that it cannot understand this concept can lead to even normally calm cats becoming very agitated and even severely stressed" sounds a little anthropomorphic to me. My cat seems to enjoy the laser pointer without ill effect.

Sounds a bit silly to me, I had a kitten that chased the beam from a flashlight. When she figured out it wasn't killable she lost interest. I'm sure the same is true for laser pointers. Personally, I would be concerned that the beam would hurt the cat's eye. Use a soft toy, much safer! Zerbey 16:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I've removed it - I agree with the above. "It cannot understand this concept" seems particularly insulting to a cat's intelligence to me. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 17:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Our little darling loves the laser pointer game. What's more, she knows that the pointer pen itself is somehow related, and goes wild if she accidentally sees the pointer pen's light when looking up. LinaMishima 18:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to need a source on that Lib3rtine 21:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. Our cats know where the laser pointer is kept and get all excited if we open that drawer. It's the only cat toy in that particular drawer, so it must be the pointer. User:Angr 20:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

That cat's something I can't explain.

Most hygienic?

Aren't cats the most hygienic animal? --DrBat 18:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Someone will probably have a better answer, but I would guess that humans are the most hygienic animal. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 18:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

But cats clean themselves on a constant basis. They don't get all sweaty and oily, either. --DrBat 19:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Most Common Names

I have to cats there names are zoey and boo. Out of all my frineds cats there have been 10 zoeys so Zoey is a very common name I would suppose. Many of my friends have a cat named Freckles but thats not a very common name. Cats have all diffrent names and theres is no telling which name is the most common.

 Melissa

Cite source: 2yr lifespan for urban feral cats

There is no source marked for the following statement: "Feral cats living in modern urban environments often live only two years, or less.". Such a strongly worded statement seems to me to deserve a citation of a source to back it up. Not arguing over the figure, although I'm not sure about it. I'd rather just have a good reference found. LinaMishima 18:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)