Talk:Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: SkywalkerEccleston (talk · contribs) 09:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 09:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

I'll take this one, expect initial comments initial comments in 24-48 hours. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Going section by section.

Lead

• There shouldn't be citations in the Lead
• Last sentence- paraphrase in wiki-voice

Early life

• I think the "ergo she was born ..." should be in quotes, as it seems quoted?
• Lead says her family was powerful, no refs or prose here that suggests that?
• Is that all about her, or can it be expanded?

Death and legacy

• Can this be expanded?

Issue

• Include as prose in the article, does not need a section
• Why was the Duke of Osuna helping her?
• Making some changes for grammar, and length of paragraphs, feel free to partially revert

References

Good, all reliable

In Rome

• This was to the despair of O'Neill's dependents.: Does not feel like wikivoice

Rest of the article

All fine, fixed the minor issues myself. Feel free to check if the edits are correct though.

Spot-check

Checking every 8th ref in general

• Ref-1: One of the most powerful families ... that of Magennis
• Ref-9: "excellent education and character"
• Ref-17: Seaan was born in October, 1599
• Ref-25: Whatever prompted the flight, it was a snap decision.
• Ref-33: Catherine complained frequently ... her young sons, John and Brian ... raised by the Louvain Franciscans ... denied by the Spanish authorities.
• Ref-42: She remained in Naples and passed away .... mid-March, 1619.

Overall

Will review the rest later, SkywalkerEccelston. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewed another section. And shit, apparently my ping was wrong, SkywalkerEccleston.Sorry about that. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

No worries, I will start updating the page SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

DoctorWhoFan91 Ready for your further review SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Not all issues have been fixed/replied to. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

SkywalkerEccleston, completed my review, no new issues arose except some minor ones which I fixed myself. But you haven't fixed/replied to whether the two sections can be expanded or not. If and when those are done, I'll do a spot-check, and pass it to GA.DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi DoctorWhoFan91, the Early life and Death and legacy sections cannot be expanded. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

SkywalkerEccleston, spot-check done, and it went well, passing the article to GA. Well done, it was very well-written! Congratulations, keep up the good work! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 10:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·