DoctorWhoFan91
Welcome!
editHello, DoctorWhoFan91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- How to avoid a conflict of interest
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! amlz (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
AI Figures
editHey there , I noticed you replaced the source for AI figures on the series 13 page with one from DWM. I don't have a copy of this, so do you know if it happens to include the figures for the 2022 specials as well? If so, could you verify and update them there as well? TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't, and neither does the next year's ones. Will have to go looking for where we can find it. I'll do it later, there are a lot of DWM issues to sift through for 2 small words in 80-100 pages each. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'll definitely keep looking for online sources myself as well. Thanks so much for checking! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: September 2024 Newsletter
editThe Space-Time Telegraph
Volume II, Issue II — September 2024 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who You like Doctor Who? What's his name then? Welcome
Articles for deletion
Notice of Draft Articles
Doctor Who News
Continued Progress Towards Good/Featured Content
Proposals Regarding the State of Fictional Elements Articles in the WikiProject
Contributors
"I'm not appalled by it" - The New New York Times If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter or have any feedback, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
edit- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who § Disruptive editing on The Doctor and The Fugitive Doctor
editYou are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who § Disruptive editing on The Doctor and The Fugitive Doctor. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
My first GAN was originally picked up by someone way too inexperienced to properly review it, and so I must admit that I was skeptical when you chose to review my second GAN, given your newcomer status. It's safe to say you defied my expectations, conducting (what I thought was) a very clear and rigorous review. Thanks for your help, and keep up the good work! Giraffer (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the message and the barnstar! I have grown better with each GAN review I have done, and yours was an easy one- the article was concise, easy to read and focused; and your response to the review was great too. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Doctor Who series 2
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Who series 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Forest of the Dead
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forest of the Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Silence in the Library
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silence in the Library you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Silence in the Library
editThe article Silence in the Library you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Silence in the Library and Talk:Silence in the Library/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Silence in the Library
editThe article Silence in the Library you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silence in the Library for comments about the article, and Talk:Silence in the Library/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Doctor Who series 2
editThe article Doctor Who series 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doctor Who series 2 for comments about the article, and Talk:Doctor Who series 2/GA4 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 15:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
edit- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Your GA nomination of The Christmas Invasion
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Christmas Invasion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Christmas Invasion
editThe article The Christmas Invasion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Christmas Invasion and Talk:The Christmas Invasion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Christmas Invasion
editThe article The Christmas Invasion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Christmas Invasion for comments about the article, and Talk:The Christmas Invasion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Wish we had a unique barnstar at WP:DOCTORWHO, but whatever the case, I figured I'd send this your way. You've joined this Project only recently, and yet you've very much shown a commitment to quality and improvement, and you have several Good Articles already. Congratulations on your accomplishments thus far, and keep up the excellent work. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with @Pokelego999, well done! And thanks for taking my copyediting critiques so graciously. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 07:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for having patience during the GAN, I'll make sure to check the articles better before making a GAN. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with @Pokelego999, well done! And thanks for taking my copyediting critiques so graciously. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 07:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Forest of the Dead
editThe article Forest of the Dead you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Forest of the Dead for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Forest of the Dead
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forest of the Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
A Barnsatr for you
editThe Original Barnstar | ||
For your high qaulity GANR throughout the past month and for taking on the challenge of reviewing two medical articles. I applaud your ability to branch out as it personally took me over a year to branch out. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the barnstar! It's even more fitting coming from you, the quantity and quality of your GANRs is partially what drove me to review so many. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm glad my overly competitive nature has some benifets. I hope you stick around with GANR as you seem to have a knack for it (is that how you spell knack?). IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is how you spell knack, though not how you spell benfits or barnstar[Joke]. I hope you stick around with GANR too. I will too, but probably after a break from GANRs for a month or two. Hope to see more of your GANs the next time I decide to start a GANR. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Grammarly doesn't work in the visual editor for replying on talk pages hence the typos. I have always been a terrible speller. I too need a bit of a break from GANR and GAN but hope to see you around. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is how you spell knack, though not how you spell benfits or barnstar[Joke]. I hope you stick around with GANR too. I will too, but probably after a break from GANRs for a month or two. Hope to see more of your GANs the next time I decide to start a GANR. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm glad my overly competitive nature has some benifets. I hope you stick around with GANR as you seem to have a knack for it (is that how you spell knack?). IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GAN backlog drive
editThe Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar | ||
Your noteworthy contribution (34 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
edit- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
Your GA nomination of Midnight (Doctor Who)
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Midnight (Doctor Who) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 16:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Forest of the Dead
editThe article Forest of the Dead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Forest of the Dead and Talk:Forest of the Dead/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 02:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Forest of the Dead
editThe article Forest of the Dead you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forest of the Dead for comments about the article, and Talk:Forest of the Dead/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
editArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)