Talk:Central Case Examination Group
 | A fact from Central Case Examination Group appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 431 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Sourcing of claims
editIs there no other literature on the subject than Schoenhals and MacFarquhar? It would be nice to see some of their claims corroborated by other researchers, in particular by PRC scholars.Villa Giulia (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, we need to check their original sources on this, because, given their claims, I would anticipate close corroboration with other English and Chinese-language sources. For instance if anyone knows what the original Chinese term of this group might be, I could potentially look up more sources. Colipon+(Talk) 04:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Central Case Examination Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141108084658/http://www.laoren.com/lrbmw/2014/392357.shtml to http://www.laoren.com/lrbmw/2014/392357.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)