Talk:Cesena

Gauls

I changed "after a brief Gaul rule" to "After a brief spell under Gaulish rule." I'm not 100% sure if this is what the was meant by a "brief Gaul rule", but it is at least less ambiguous. I would be grateful if anybody could make sure I have got this right. - Ireneshusband 16:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

I changed thousands of cvilians to between 2,500 and 5,000. Its a more precise number and is more correct.Imbored24 08:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cesena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511043525/http://www.turismo.fc.it/_vti_g2_1.aspx to http://www.turismo.fc.it/_vti_g2_1.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—73.14.196.99 (talk) 06:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

You haven't explained what you think is wrong with the coordinates. They seem to have been basically correct, but I've added a bit of precision to indicate a point nearer the center of the city. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)