Talk:Chacal-class destroyer
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
 | Chacal-class destroyer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 3, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Chacal-class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- "The primary role of the larger contre-torpilleur was scouting with battleline defense secondary and attacking the enemy battleline in third place." - this reads awkwardly and took a couple of tries to parse. Part of the problem is non-parallel structure (i.e., you have a list of gerund, noun, gerund)
- "all weathers" - I think you can ditch the "s"
- "The former was sunk the next day off Dunkirk and the latter" - former and latter only work when discussing 2 things - you have 3 destroyers mentioned here.
- "They were turned her over" - something's wrong here
- link rate of fire
- One dupe link
- Hide the dab for U-136
- All done, see how the changes work for you. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)