Talk:Chakma Circle

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2015.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Possible hoax article

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This is referenced to unreliable sources. Can anybody check it out properly? Is it even real? --DanielRigal (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

After reading this, I am coming to the conclusion that this is massively oversold if not outright WP:Bollocks. This seems to be a clan chiefdom not a royal family. I see no evidence of a historic nation or kingdom. I am inclined towards an AfD of all the alleged "kings" who do not demonstrate genuine additional notability and either including this article in the AfD or cutting it down to what can proven and shown to be notable. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am going to start by sweeping up everything on the subject into one place: Category:Chakma Royal Family. That way we will have an idea of how much we are dealing with. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am also going to be purging the non RS pseudo-references as I feel that they are linkspam for blogs and social media operated by the editor who is adding them. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'd support starting an AfD in a few days (or later). — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 15:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic