Talk:Chandrayaan programme
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chandrayaan programme article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 22 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Indian Lunar Exploration Programme. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Verification
edit@Knowshare1: Dear editor, kindly provide a reliable source to verify your suggestion/theory about the timeframe of Phase III. Till then, do not change or revert the article. Also consider this a warning. Thank you! — Akshadév™ 💬 07:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Removal of speculated CY5 mission.
editNeeraj Srivastava in the cited source is clearly expressing a personal opinion on plausibility of road map based approach towards planetary exploration. He is specifically urging the senior officials to seek feasibility of roadmap based approvals and not just for one off missions. This further proves the lack of programmatic roadmap for Indian planetary exploration. Number of pages based on poor understanding of casual presentations and to be honest, subject matter in general, have been created. I urge authors to be more responsible and cite reliable sources like budget documents, approval announcements, payload AO etc. Ohsin 13:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you restored it again ? Mr Unknown233 (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I intended to add a missing reference but mistakenly restored CY5 content as well. Fixed. Ohsin 15:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2023
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Chandrayaan 3 contrary to what is written in the Wikipedia article is not a miserable failure but rather a success. 182.69.66.105 (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
"Chandrayaan-6" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Chandrayaan-6 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 12 § Chandrayaan-6 until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 22 November 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Chandrayaan programme → Indian Lunar Exploration Programme – This article also includes the LUPEX mission is seperate form the Chandrayaan programme. SKAG123 (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – 64andtim (talk) 03:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- No LakhnawiNawab (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Spaceflight has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Astronomy has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: As per my own knowledge, Chandrayaan is the WP:COMMONNAME. Relisting to generate wider community consensus. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- NO (per common name) Sohom (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Simplification
edithello, does anyone else think that the History and Structure sections can be well simplified and merged? It seems to be as if both cover the same topic but from different perspectives. Maybe the structor can say a very basic roadmap of the the program and all components , both launched and planned, as well as a simple diagram or chart and the History section saying more aboth the phases with the missions also included. Thx RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Coming across similar thoughts very recently. At the time of writing the entire article, I wasn't aware of article writing guidelines and carried on until I could and thus ended up with this ginormous article. Will contribute whatever I can in fixing it up. Footy2000♡; 19:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Aannnd done. Repurposed the section to list all the spacecrafts part of the program and moved history bits in the previous version of the section to history section. Moved planned developments in their own dedicated section at the end of the article. Also removed the vague phases that aren't part of the program officially and were just made up in this article. Footy2000♡; 11:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- thankxxx RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)