Talk:Charles Read (RAAF officer)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charles Read (RAAF officer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Charles Read (RAAF officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 2, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Air Marshal Charles Read broke with tradition by refusing to sit for the usual portrait painted of retiring RAAF Chiefs of the Air Staff? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Charles Read (RAAF officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 22:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Lead
-
- "during World War II" --> "during Second World War" the latter is used mainly by the Brits.
- Don't disagree but I use WWII in every article and it seems to be accepted.
- again "Deputy Chief of the Air Staff" is capitalised, while "air vice marshal" isn't.
- Senior titles/positions seem to take caps while ranks do not.
- "in March 1972, when the latter cut short his term"? Shouldn't "latter" be "later"? But then, it doesn't make sense, because "when" implies the action took place during the mentioned time.
- "Latter" is correct English, it means the second of the two people mentioned.
- Early career
-
- what's a "Leaving Certificate"?
- An Australian school certification.
- replace "operating" in "and operating Hawker Demon" with "piloting".
- "operating Hawker Demon" refers to the squadron, rather than Read personally, so I think it's correct grammatically.
- World War II
-
- "Following service with No. 30 Squadron, from October 1942 Squadron Leader Read" replace "from" with "in".
- Thank you, not sure why I said "from"...
- "with cannon" --> "with a cannon"?
- Heh, I suppose it can sound odd but this is how the term is generally used in my experience. In fact "cannon" is both singular and plural, and the Beau had multiple guns.
- If this article being read offline, the reader might not know what the "London Gazette". Please add a brief description.
- I don't want to seem obstructive, but I don't think I ever seen it spelt out in any of the many articles in which it's mentioned -- I don't think most journals are described, just their name is given (with a link if they have one).
- Rest of article
-
- Looks good
- Miscellany
-
- Please add alt
- Not actually required I don't think, but will do. Thanks for reviewing! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, anything more to do here...? ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Charles Read (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.airforce.gov.au/Units/2fts.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)