Talk:Chhota Ghallughara

POV / References

Concur with previous issues regarding POV. Regardless of semantics, the references provided are not remotely unbiased. I am noticing this trend in many pages relating to Sikhism and Sikh persecution - suspect mass editing/contributions by a single, agenda-driven author. IronSheep (talk) 04:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Major tone/POV problems

If you want Sikh history to be taken seriously, you really need to adopt an academic and neutral tone in this article. Words like "temerity" and "martyrdom" will cause people to write off this article as terribly biased. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I disagree: the tone is academic enough, there's nothing wrong with "temerity" and "martyrdom" (the word is all over Christian and Islamic history and they seem to be taken seriously), and the tone of your comment is offensively patronizing. A few word alterations and maybe some more modern references (if any in English exist) are needed however. Magmagoblin2 (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the first point by MatthewVanitas, that this article needs a major tone shift. First, it doesn't matter what others say about other religions, the issue at hand is this article. If those "sources" you alluded to need cleaning up then please offer your assistance in doing so. I don't think any offense was meant in the previous comments, but rest-assured I don't mean any. I think that there is a lot of contention here and it does not conform to wiki standards. E.g. in the "temerity" and "martyrdom" sections there is only one reference (the same one) and it hardly seems unbiased. When talking about "genocide" there needs to be a high standard of writing to ensure the article is not a political tool. In other examples of contentious writing one would also expect unaffiliated, multiple points of citation. Mellowfellow

The wikipedia article sounds more like a religious text than an factual search. The distances noted between River Ravi and Bathinda jungle are huge and too big to be done in one day. It reads more like a religious leader talking than a researcher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.34.117.5 (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Move 14 June 2015

Sikh holocaust of 1746 → Sikh genocide of 1746 – The word "holocaust" is too opinionated. There's no reason to use the more straight forward word "genocide". Durranina (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Please see Holodomor for comparison. Article can be renamed to Chhōtā Ghallūghārā. As per discussion on talk page, this has to be done. Thanks:)Messiaindarain (talk) 03:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

See [1][2][3][4], holocaust is more common word for referring this incident. Maybe massacre is a candidate but still better than changing to a word like, that is very less used in English sources. Raymond3023 (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chhōtā Ghallūghārā. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090611040906/http://www.allaboutsikhs.com:80/gurudwaras-in-pakistan/gurudwara-shahid-ganj-sighnian-lahore.html to http://www.allaboutsikhs.com/gurudwaras-in-pakistan/gurudwara-shahid-ganj-sighnian-lahore.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

"Sikh holocaust of 1746" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sikh holocaust of 1746. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Sikh holocaust of 1746 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Chhotta-ghallughara.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)