Talk:Chicago casino proposals

Name change

Seeing how Bally's was approved, I created an article about Bally's Chicago (the casino complex), perhaps this article should have its name changed to Chicago casino proposal process or something to that nature seeing how this proposed casino is now officially Bally's Chicago. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Alternatively, the two could just be merged. Paris1127 (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Makes sense, I think that Bally's Chicago should be the main article being how that'll be the permanent casino complex. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

I personally think the the amount of press sufficiently qualifies notability guidelines for this to be it's own article. The process still isn't over yet, it still has to go through major hurdles, and not all sites are out of the competition yet. Sea Cow (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

On a different note, you have no idea how happy I am to see two other Chicago Area Wikipedians, since tony the tiger is rather inactive now. I didn't know you two existed. It really brought a smile to my face. Sea Cow (talk) 22:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Deceptive username, non?

As for this article, I had moved it to put it in line with some other articles I've seen about proposed structures. And also because not every word in the title needs to be capitalized, per WP:NCCPT. So if consensus exists to keep it with this title, I could be satisfied with Chicago casino proposals. Paris1127 (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I'd be great with that. When I wrote this article, it's not about the proposed structure, it's about the process of deciding. Your capitalization fixes would make this better. Sea Cow (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Y Done. Paris1127 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sea Cow: & @Paris1127: You guys from Chicago?! That's awesome I always thought I was the only active Chicagoan on here lol. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: nice work.

North8000 (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)