Talk:Childhood disintegrative disorder

Latest comment: 9 months ago by NineLion in topic Source 4 is self-referential


Untitled

edit

Medication for any PDD is controversial at best, and indications are that it may be damaging to the child. "Quack" cures are a blanket statement with no useful specificity for parents with kids with this condition. Not suprisingly, this was added by an anonymous editor. --Leifern 20:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

There is a mention under 'Medication' that anticonvulsives may be used to treat seizures caused by the disorder, but seizures don't actually seem to appear on the list of symptoms. What gives? -Toptomcat (talk) 05:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dupe article

edit

See the history for Child disintegrative disorder. This is offtopic, but I hardly ever newpage patrol, and I saw that article like three days before WLU mentioned it in a totally unrelated talk page. What are the odds?

(Well actually the odds are probably pretty good when you consider I've edited ~4,000 different articles and factor in the birthday effect. But it was cool.) <eleland/talkedits> 05:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The above comments are hard to follow, as they include personal comments that don't advance the subject discussion, and use jargon. Does "Dupe article" mean duplicate article? I'm not a fan of social media style in an encyclopedia improvement discussion. Anyway, it would help if the article stated how common the disorder is statistically, to augment the word "rare". I couldn't find a number/rate (1 in ???) in my cursory research. Myheck (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)--Myheck (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Pelka

edit

Hi, I am having trouble learning how to reference one of the sources of my edit.Can someone please assist to move the reference to its correct location.I could also add further sources if needed or desired. I tried to add that piece to my tiny addition to the page warning about how it can be mistaken for child abuse,probably particularly at early stages of investigations.Thank you-Susiedarling................ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susiedarling (talkcontribs) 20:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Child abuse has nothing to do with Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, which incidently ceased to be a clinical diagnosis May 2013 (DSM5 re defining Autism). A further problem is that your contribution is not supported by a secondary research journal source which is required for wikipedia medical articles. You may be better advised to make your contribution to a more general article regarding the Daniel Pelka case. Childhood Disintegrative Disorder applied to children of age 4 years of age plus who experienced a form of regression which results in atypical autistic attributes, Daniel Pelka was not old enough to experience Childhood Disintegrative Disorder. Hopefully you will understand why your contribution will be deleted again. dolfrog (talk) 22:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Implications of DSM5 may 2013

edit

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 revise how Autism and the related disorders are defined and diagnosed. The PDD-NOS category was discontinued which included Childhood Disintegrative Disorde, which will be part of the wider age considerations regarding regression in the revised diagnosis of Autism. This as been well described in Volkmar FR, Reichow B, McPartland J (2012). "Classification of autism and related conditions: progress, challenges, and opportunities". Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 14 (3): 229–37. PMC 3513678. PMID 23226949. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) In recent weeks I have compiled a PubMed collection of Childhood Disintegrative Disorder (CDD) which can now only be of historical value dolfrog (talk) 23:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Question: Has this disorder ever been known to affect adults?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Childhood disintegrative disorder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Late onset of developmental delays?

edit

The first paragraph says that PDD is "characterized by late onset of developmental delays." I am a clinical psychologist and I don't know what this means. How can a developmental delay be late? Please reword. This is confusing at best. --1000Faces (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

is http://yamo.iliensale.com/ reliable?

edit

I wanted to source the statement "Treatment of CDD involves both behavior therapy, environmental therapy and medications." It was copied and pasted from Can disintegrative disorder be cured? (iliensale.com). Is this website a reliable source? It seems to be a website in which you can ask questions, but I was suspicious of its reliability. Edit: I found another source Samnaderi (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Source 4 is self-referential

edit

The source titled What does childhood disintegrative disorder mean? (definitions.net) links to a collection of definitions. The text provided cites Wikipedia as the source. What does childhood disintegrative disorder mean? (definitions.net) should be removed as a source entirely. I would, but I can't figure out how to delete a reference. NineLion (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply