Talk:Chilean battleship Capitán Prat

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Parsecboy in topic Photo
Good articleChilean battleship Capitán Prat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 16, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1898, the United States Navy attempted to purchase a battleship from Chile for use against Spain?

DYK nomination

edit

Gun configuration

edit

First para says two twin turrets, fourth para describes four single turrets. Can't both be right.220.239.99.94 (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good call, thanks for catching that. I've fixed it now. Parsecboy (talk) 15:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chilean battleship Capitán Prat. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photo

edit

Here - better version of the current lead image. Parsecboy (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply