Talk:Chilean video game content rating system

Do not add comparisons to other countries

Please do not add comparisons to other countries' systems. Thank you. (talk) 7:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Why? The Resolution 5,733 exempted, September, 2014 explitly mentions those equivalents. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

You are in violation of WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTDATABASE when you add such indiscriminate information like that. Several other film, TV and video game ratings/classification articles had been, at times, plagued by this irrelevant trivia that must be avoided, per the two guidelines. Loyalmoonie (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Of course this is relevant, for this specific case, as the cited Resolution mentions that, therefore, is part of the information of the classification. This is not what I invented but what say the laws/decrees, and it is properly sourced. Also, don't add commented text to the article itself; consensus should be reached here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

DISPUTE

At times, I felt best to clean up some of the video game, film and television ratings/classification articles to make sure that there are no lists of films, shows, games, etc., and/or that users put in comparisons to other countries' rating/classification systems (including, but not limited to, adding "this rating is similar to X-country's rating", etc.), as such edits seem to violate WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE. Currently, I am in a mild dispute with Amitie 10g on this matter.

I have been cleaning up some of the related articles for the above reasons, and came across this article having comparisons to other systems by writing them in a table. I removed that and added a hidden notice to warn would-be editors to refrain from adding such unnecessary information. I have had to revert some edits on other articles in the past at times because I thought that I was cleaning up the irrelevant trivia to comply with WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE. Unfortunately, Amitie 10g does not seem to see it that way, and decided to attack my good will in cleaning up the article by accusing me of violating WP:POINT in the edit summary.

At no time was I/am I ever disrupting Wikipedia to make a point; I was just doing what I thought was best by cleaning up the article to comply with WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE...that is not being disruptive, but Amitie 10g seems to think that I was, and even if the comparisons were properly sourced, however, they still violate WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTDATABASE, and should be avoided per those two guidelines. Loyalmoonie (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)