Talk:Chloë Fox
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
editDid the way she went about her teaching duties really break enough headlines to make an encyclopedia? These anonymous repeated edits about her teaching style are pointless. Timeshift 09:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
"Factually incorrect information"
editI have asked A1133628 (talk · contribs), on his/her talk page, to supply references backing up the edits s/he is making. Mark Hurd (talk) 02:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Actually this change is backed up by existing references. Mark Hurd (talk) 02:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The Advertiser/Valdman dispute
editI'm wondering how much coverage we should provide to this. From what I can tell, The Advertiser published a Valdman cartoon that Chloë Fox disputed; she threatened to sue, Valdman apologised; and everyone went home. It seems like a really minor event. I don;t think it is worth covering in general, but it really doesn't seem worth placing in its own section. - Bilby (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chloë Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110822205030/http://www.sa.alp.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&Itemid=36 to http://www.sa.alp.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&itemid=36
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091012163117/http://www.chloefox.com.au/aboutchloe.php to http://www.chloefox.com.au/aboutchloe.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820012229/http://www.sa.alp.org.au/people/sa/fox_chloe.php to http://www.sa.alp.org.au/people/sa/fox_chloe.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)