Wikipedia

Talk:Chloe Mitchell

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleChloe Mitchell has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 23, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was support for move.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Chloe Mitchell Ashby → Chloe Mitchell — I'm requesting the page Chloe Mitchell Ashby to be moved to Chloe Michell for the reason that this character's common name is Chloe Mitchell despite her marriage. She is referred to by this common name by other characters on the series. — Rocksey (talk) 18:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


why does an ultimately bland and unimportant fictional character from an ultimately bland an unimportant television show deserve a 5,000 word article? this sort of ridiculous fan-lit is the one overriding reason why wikipedia will never be taken seriously as an encyclopedia. 119.18.18.208 (talk) 08:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chloe's job

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Doesn't Chloe still work at Restless Style? She was there one day last week, and I swore she was taking orders from Phyllis. Allukka (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't believe she works at Restless Style anymore. I believe Harmony replaced her. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Newest picture

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The current photo of Chloe Fisher is the best I have ever seen. Very nice. Allukka (talk) 10:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Chloe Mitchell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit
  • If you're going to list the previous child actors in the "portrayed by" parameter, then a caption is needed for the image. "Elizabeth Hendrickson as Chloe Fisher".
  • "After brief marriages to Cane and then Billy, Chloe begins an unsuccessful streak of relationships with men including: Chance Chancellor (John Driscoll), Ronan Malloy (Jeff Branson), and most recently Kevin Fisher (Greg Rikaart)." Remove the ":", no need.
  • I believe the correct linking for John Driscoll is John Driscoll (actor). Fix all the links to that name.
  • TV Guide's Nelson Branco --> Nelson Branco of TV Guide
  • "Katherine Tina Valentine was introduced by then-executive producer" --> former executive producer
  • Unlink Elizabeth Hendrickson in the casting section.
  • Put "Y&R" and "AMC" in italics (in the quote in the casting section).
  • "Hendrickson was pleased that the writers decided to give Chloe a backstory," add something like "saying:" to the end of that.
  • "Hendrickson compared their relationship, which ensued as a result of Chloe practically "threatening him", to the psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction (1987)" --> "to the 1987 psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction".
  • "Billy Abbott (Billy Millor)" --> I'm assuming "Millor" was a typo? It's spelt "Miller".
  • "However, the marriage and romance was prematurely ended to pave the way for the reunion between Billy and his highschool sweetheart Mac Browning (Clementine Ford)". Change "highschool" to "high school".
  • "and mob princess Angelina Veneziano's (Diana DeGarmo) intense crush on Kevin (Which leads to a brief marriage, with Angelina's mob father threatening to kill Kevin if he doesn't wed his daughter)" --> "Which" should be with a lower case w.
  • Remove redundancy of "A writer from Zap2it" in reception. Just say "They wrote,".
  • Considering how the "in popular culture" section consists of just one fact, I would suggest merging it into reception somehow.
  • Overall, these concerns need to be addressed before the review can go any further. Once they have been, I will return to pass/fail the article. Cheers, --Brick House 337 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed everything so far. Thankyou for taking on the review! — Arre 03:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Final GA review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Fairly well covered as far as focus.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Overall, the article is in good article condition. I don't see any further issues that need to be addressed. Pass. --Brick House 337 04:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thankyou so much Brick House, for the review, and for making it so fast as usual. Much love!— Arre 04:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wow! This article is fantastic. Congratulations on WP:GA status

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I decided to check back in on this article after this edit, and, wow, I'm blown away by how improved/great this article now is. This kind of work, I don't expect anything less from Arre 9. Thank you, Arre 9. This article is now back on my WP:Watchlist; part of the reason I came back to this article minutes ago was to not only check in on it, but re-add it to my WP:Watchlist. Flyer22 (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Chloe Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chloe Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Chloe Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chloe_Mitchell&oldid=1206669793"