Talk:Christo van Rensburg
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mo ainm in topic Article not adhering to MOSFLAG
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
why tag was added
editUntitled
editthis article needs souces thanksOo7565 03:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the flag from the infobox citing MOSFLAG in that flags are not to be used in infobox or to represent a persons nationality. Mo ainm~Talk 10:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
"If the use of flags in a list, table or infobox makes it unclear, ambiguous or controversial, it is better to remove the flags even if that makes the list, table or infobox inconsistent with others of the same type where no problems have arisen." Yes it also says discourage but the rest say put it in. 194.66.216.40 (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- What information does the flag convey that the text beside it doesn't already convey? Mo ainm~Talk 10:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed please see WP:BURDEN onus is on editor adding content to show what encyclopaedic content the addition of this flag adds to the article that the text doesn't already show. Mo ainm~Talk 11:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- What a crappy rule. just there to make people get their own way, cannot go against a project 194.66.216.40 (talk) 13:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Just because you see something as a "crappy rule" doesn't mean you can ignore it. Mo ainm~Talk 13:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- What a crappy rule. just there to make people get their own way, cannot go against a project 194.66.216.40 (talk) 13:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed please see WP:BURDEN onus is on editor adding content to show what encyclopaedic content the addition of this flag adds to the article that the text doesn't already show. Mo ainm~Talk 11:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)