194.66.216.40

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 194.66.216.40). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

• Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
• Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 17:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Warnings

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. --Wine Guy Talk 12:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonrojo 17:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tony Blair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Viewfinder 15:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during February 7 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Southampton F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Southampton F.C. was changed by 194.66.216.40 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-19T13:28:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Attempted murder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 16:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mary Shelley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~Pip 12:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jamie Mackie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of bicycle types, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of bicycle types was changed by 194.66.216.40 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-19T16:04:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Flying disc. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Operant conditioning, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Operant conditioning was changed by 194.66.216.40 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-11-09T16:35:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of Chichester has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 15:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Jamie Carragher. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —Aaroncrick (talk) 10:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Take That. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CIreland (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas Boleyn, 1st Earl of Wiltshire, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nile Ranger with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Tennis at the 2012 Summer Olympics

Please stop undoing my edit at the above page. Adding the mixed doubles champions from 1924 under a heading that reads "2008 Champions" is extremely misleading. I haved added the names of the 1924 champions to the main text in the article but they simply do not belong in that infobox unless they appear under a seperate heading. Thanks- Basement12 (T.C) 14:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

FYI regarding List of Olympic venues in tennis, Jeu de paume is the name the Olympics uses for indoor (real) tennis, the event is named as such in the official report for the 1908 Games. I've put the note there as "lawn tennis" as the 1908 report refers to it was not staged at Queens so there is a need to be clear in the table - Basement12 (T.C) 15:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

---

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.66.216.40 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was not abusive. just some people need to grow up and learn the rules. instead of running off every 2 minutes crying to their mummy. This is the internet not a nursery FFS. I didn't swear or abuse people, and will not be doing now that Ma waht ever the crap his called has disengaged from his war. 194.66.216.40 (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No attempt to address the reasons for the block -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hang on what am I block for,. Distruptive editing or personal attacks or herassment. I have not being distruptive so why am I block as per the reasons on this talk page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.66.216.40 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

apparently i've been blocked for distrupitve editing. If having a discussion and banging head against wall is erm distrupitve then I appologise and have left the discussion now. No more comment from me on it.10:54 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

As indicated in your block log, you have been blocked for your personal attacks. Continuing to attack other editors in your unblock requests will not get you unblocked. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! ^(Whisper...) 10:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Keith Chegwin, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page University of Chichester has been reverted.
Your edit here to University of Chichester was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/UniversityofChichester) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2016

Hello, I'm Emotionalllama. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Union J has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emotionalllama (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on John Robins (comedian), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm The79. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bob Mortimer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! The79 (talk) 10:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Curtis Anderson

Hello!

I saw that you reverted my edit about Curtis Anderson. I do not actually think his loan got cancelled, because players loaned out by clubs can play in EFL Trophy games as this is highlighted in player criteria in the rules of the competition. Is there like an article saying that his loan was cancelled just to 100% make sure that is the case?

Thank you. ChesnutTreesNearTheGreen (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Miss Julie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Blue Edits (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---