Talk:Chrysomya putoria

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Member of genus Chrysomya on a leaf

• ... that Chrysomya putoria and other flies that feed on decomposing flesh are used as important tools in forensic entomology to establish the post-mortem interval? Source: Amorim and Ribeiro. (2001)
  • ALT1:... that Chrysomya putoria larvae can potentially be used in maggot therapy by removing dead tissue in wounds to promote the growth of new tissue? Source: Ferraz et al. (2014)
  • ALT2:... that the synanthropy of Chrysomya putoria may contribute to a major health impact on people in developing countries? Source: Baumgartner and Greenberg. (1984)

5x expanded by Mmhua (talk). Self-nominated at 17:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC).

• GTG for main hook & ALT 1. A delightful read! Expanded & long enough. Neutral well-written & referenced. Main hook & ALT 1 check out (though the later refs support the main hook better than that given). I can only read the abstract for ALT2, which doesn't support the hook, with no mention of "major health impact", but the other two are better hooks imo anyway. Earwig finds nothing. Pic ok to use - though a cropped version might be better. Johnbod (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you so much for your thorough review! I have taken your suggestion into account and uploaded a cropped version of the image. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do. Thanks again! --Mmhua (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmhua.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Behavioral Ecology Peer Review

Margaret, this is a really good article! There is tons of information, everything is well cited, and well written. There were a couple things I think were still confusing, especially for a general audience. When describing larva, you talk about spiracles and spiracular openings. That description is confusing. I added a Wiki link to a page on spiracles, so that should be helpful to a general audience, but I think the language needs clarification. It also would be great if you described what a frons is-I struggled to find it on the Wiki page linked, but there isn't one specific to frons. Also there's no Wiki page for synanthropy, which seems an important adjective for this fly, so definitely explaining that term would be helpful to a general audience. You mention that these flies have parasitic relationships with bacteria, so I think it would be cool if you could expand that and include a section on their microbiome or if they have an mutalistic relationships. Also I know most blow flies have oviposition, so including a section on parental care and seeing if they also oviposit would be good!Montana.sievert (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Great job with this article, it was a pleasant read. Your prose throughout the article is clear and unbiased. I edited some small grammatical and syntactical errors, as well as added a good amount of hyperlinks. I agree with Montana that some of the technical terms you use throughout the article should be better explained, as this would make it easier for a more general audience to understand. I like that you included many different sections but I think some of your shorter ones should be expanded if possible. Your sections on enemies, social behavior and the egg section of life history are all only about 1 sentence each, and I would like to hear some more info! I would also add sections on mating and parental care if the information is available, as these are important behaviors. Overall, great job and keep expanding on this if possible! Christina.lindberg (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I enjoyed reading this article! I think you've done a great job finding information on a fly that isn't particularly as well researched. This article serves as a great framework to be elaborated on, as you've made a point to include sections and provide even the basic information available relevant to them. In its current form, the article does make reference to a few technical terms or specific behaviors that may be linked but would be confusing to understand. Hence (and I understand it's hard to find sources for this) it would help if some techinical ideas like larval gregariousness, aand were elaborated on a little bit. The things I would encourage people who expand on this article to focus on would be- description of predations of this species and how they might occur, some more information on the interspecific competition that larvae of this species experience. I specified these areas as it seems the information on these sections should be available currently. I made some changes to grammar and organisation, but I really liked this article Margaret!Agandhi7 (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This article was well written and contained extensive detail, indicating thorough research. Information was well cited and written in a professional neutral tone. I added additional hyperlinks and made some grammatical/syntax changes. One area for article improvement would be to add a few more sentences explaining PMI analysis in Forensics, because that is an area unique to your fly that appears to play significant. Overall great work! Rchiou (talk) 15:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

A good example

I've been using this article in a demonstration at Lincoln University, New Zealand, of how Wikipedia articles work. Good job! —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)