Talk:Chuck Versus Agent X/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Boycool42 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 01:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • The talkpage needs Wikiprojects
    • Done.
  • The plot section is largely confusing to me (a non-Chuck watcher). Not sure if this can be fixed enough for non-viewers to comprehend, but I recommend giving it a slight rewrite
    • The episode itself was largely confusing, even for a hardcore viewer like me, but the summary is not quite chronological, especially in the first few paragraphs. It's only 372 or so words, so I'll work on it later.
      • I edited the plot and I think it's just about as detailed as it can get to be clear to non-Chuck viewers without going over on detail (or word count).
  • In the lead you say a character "makes a life-changing discovery" from a laptop, but the plot is unclear on this (it just says "spy will")
    • I tweaked the plot summary in the lead, because it wasn't true to the episode's actual plot.
  • Indicate Jeffster! is a band
    • Done
  • Too many "also"s and "revealed"s in production
    • I removed an "also" and changed a few "revealed"s. Tell me if there are still too many.
  • I recommend combining music and cultural ref sections (combine under "Music and cultural references" heading)
    • Done.
  • Websites are not italicize (i.e. TV by the Numbers (add wikilink also)). Also, Den of Geek is three words.
    • Done.
  • Sentences ending in quotes need a citation directly after period (mostly in reception section)
    • Done.
  • Ref 9 needs accessdate
    • Done; I was missing a bit of code in the ref.
  • Either italicize all Chucks and other TV shows in ref titles, or none of them
    • The only "Chuck"s italicized are the ones that were italicized in the titles of the original websites.

I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Please reply here when your edits are finished, as I will not be watching the article page. Thanks and good luck, Ruby2010 comment! 02:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 03:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks you very much! --Boycool (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply