Talk:Cinderella II: Dreams Come True

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:2438:E60E:32AB:A69A in topic Unused TV Series

The "Tall Tail" section has a grammatical error. The first sentence should read "One of Cinderella's..." (possessive). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.41 (talk) 09:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Story line of the film

edit

I have noticed that some of the details of "Tall Tale" and A Uncommon Romance" are inaccraute, I have seen the movie on TV so I know what happens. First of, where in the film did it reveal that the lady who got terrified by Jaq is the owner of Pom Pom? Last I checked, Pom Pom is owned by the royal family. And the baker never asked Anastasia to attend the ball with him, he doesn't even talk that much in the segment. So I was wondering if I could possibly get access to the article's edit page so I can fix it up? That would be nice thanks. (SilvazeWisher (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC))Reply

  Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 18:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rotten Tomatoes Approval Rating Incorrect

edit

In the reception section of the article it's claimed that Cinderella 2 has the rare approval rating of 0% on Rottentomatoes. This is incorrect. The current approval rating is 11%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:44:4201:70A0:9C24:6149:DAEC:5DDD (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cinderella II: Dreams Come True. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Copyright (C) 2001 Disney Enterprises All Rights Reserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:598B:A2F1:C493:C74B:7108:ACF8 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 November 2023

edit

PLEASE LEMME EDIT THIS PAGE!!! PLEASE!!!! 109.53.26.241 (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you. Cannolis (talk) 06:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Crew listing in article

edit

I and others have removed the crew listing as it is not appropriate for this or any film article. See WP:INDISCRIMINATE for one reason, also WP:TRIVIA. A "crew" section with a list of non-notable people with minor roles in creating the film, likely copied from IMDb, adds no value to any film article. People with major creative roles are already mentioned in the article with descriptive context in the appropriate sections for their roles. See WP:Manual of Style/Film for what goes in a film article. A "crew" section isn't one of the items listed there so having one goes against the manual of style for film articles. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

As you told me in the talk page, what I really wanted to add in this article is exactly not appropriate at all. 93.44.213.160 (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unused TV Series

edit

Is there really confirmation that the three segments in Cinderella 2 were part of an unreleased TV series? There is no source backing up that claim, unlike Belle's Magical World, which is indeed confirmed to have been planned as a TV series. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:2438:E60E:32AB:A69A (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply