| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here. |
Name
editThis should probably be titled "Cinephale" or "Cineaste" unless this particular term is used more often than its dictionary references (none in onelook) indicate. KP Botany 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Rewrites
editI suggest that this is one of the least consistent, least encyclopedic articles on Wikipedia, and that it should be completely rewritten. It just looks like a bunch of people with a cross to bear about loving movies more than anyone else have come here, pressed enter, and written their own paragraph stating their case. Cite some sources; get rid of opinions (like the star wars thing, come on; most people under forty who have seen The Treasure of the Sierra Madre or whatever probably love Star Wars, and obsess over its minutia) and, dynamite unnecessary garbage like that NCIS section. This article is a disgrace. Youdontsmellbad (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC):
- I removed most of the material that was ruining this article. It's still not very informative. Will someone please consult a text source on this.Youdontsmellbad (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Translation Class Project
editWe are currently working on THE TRANSLATION into Spanish of this article. Translation work will be ready by the end of June 2014. For more information see Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/Universitat_Jaume_I_-_E-translating PLEASE, DO NOT TRANSLATE THIS PAGE. IF YOU DO SO, PLEASE INFORM US AT Mcptrad--Mcptrad (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was page moved. @harej 19:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Cinemaphile → Cinephilia — The most commonly used term is 'cinephilia'; the article should be there and would be more useful than the page at Cinephile, to which Cinephilia currently redirects. — Hugh 07:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Flamarande (talk) 03:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Federico Fellini.jpg Nominated for Deletion
edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Federico Fellini.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011
|
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
Moving the page
editCinephilia → Filmophile — The is more common in English. "Cinephilia" is not the most prevalent term for "film lover" or "movie buff". CerberaOdollam (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Can you cite something to back up this spurious claim? — Hugh 06:01, 6 October 2017 (UTC)