Talk:Claremont, New Hampshire

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ken Gallager in topic Lynching paragraph

Merge Infobox City NH with Infobox City?

edit

Please see the discussion here. harpchad 15:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive IP Range

edit

What is the name of the middle and/or high school in Claremont. I'm investigating a series of vandalizations from an IP traced to Claremont and apparently it has to do with some educational institution in the area. --Amaraiel 19:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The high school is Stevens High School; the middle school is Claremont Middle School. --Eevensen 01:33, 13 May 2007

Image needed

edit

Needs modern image of downtown or skyline. M (talk contribs) 02:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claremont, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Claremont, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lynching paragraph

edit

We have one or two anonymous editors who seem determined to remove the paragraph about the event last summer where a child was injured in a racial incident. Their reasons for removal vary: either it was not reported accurately, or it does not need to be added, or they do not know why it is in the article. I would like comment or input from other editors on how best to proceed so as to avoid further edit warring. Does anyone else think the paragraph needs editing? I do not believe it should be removed, as it was a widely covered event at the time and has continued to prompt a large amount of discussion within the state since then. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply