Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Girasol10002. Peer reviewers: Mintandlavender, Cinema4242.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Feedback for Girasol10002

edit

Hi Girasol10002,

Great work on this article so far. The article is easy to read, and well written. The chart of her awards is very detailed and you have plenty of sources which makes your article very reliable! I have a few suggestions to make the article even stronger. First, I would recommend you ensure that her films all have consistent formattings, such as italics and appropriate links. This will make the article look even more polished. Second, I do not think you need to include the people she worked with on The Milk of Sorrow unless they had a closer relationship to her or an impact in her life. Third, I'm not sure if the language around mentioning whether or not she uses stereotypes in her film is objective enough. Perhaps could the language be changed to present the information in a more matter of fact way?

Once again, great work! Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns!

Cinema4242 (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Second student peer review feedback:

the articles Early Life and Education section has significantly been improved with new information.

new information about films have been added to page. Very detailed descriptions of films.

awards and recognition information have been added to page.

the structure and flow of information is superior. very well written and sentences link.

information is written in a non-biased way. it is neutral.

sources are credible and well balanced. journal articles from credible databases are used.

overall, contributions done by student editor has vastly improved the page.

The introduction to the wikipedia page should be stronger. More prominent/relevant information should be displayed in the introduction.

Perhaps more information could be added to the "Early life and Education" section. It is a little bit small compared to the Career section. More information could be added to distribute the weight of the article more evenly.

A "Legacy" section would be useful for this article to enhance it.

All in all, information is accurate and detailed.

Mintandlavender (talk) 22:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)MintandLavenderReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claudia Llosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply