Talk:Club Mahindra Holidays

Please do not vandalise the page by posting personal or subjective comments. If you wish to contest facts or points in the page, we request you to post with supporting facts and annotations. IndianCorporates (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Vengeful and highly opinionted comments in the 'Criticism' section. The person seems to be a repeat offender who keeps coming back to vandalize. Reqeust admins to take appropriate corrective step. thanks. Kirubashankar (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

There's concern at the moment (admittedly a couple of months later...) that the article reads like an advertisement and fails WP:NOTABILITY. I think that there are good grounds to have a "criticism" section, but it must be supported by references from reliable sources - it can't simply be an excuse to bash Club Mahindra. Incidentally, the "Criticism" section was empty, so I've removed it, but I'd welcome another editor putting it back - subject to the previous comments about WP:CITE and WP:RS.

I'd also suggest that pro-Club Mahindra editors bear in mind the concern about advertising and notability - avoid making this article into an advertisement promoting Club Mahindra; it needs to be as neutral as possible.

Regarding WP:NOTABILITY, I personally feel that since Club Mahindra was the first major Time Share operator in India it's notable - but this needs to be reinforced by good quality references. If this isn't done the article is likely to be deleted.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 09:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

If the only notable thing about Club Mahindra Holiday is that it was the first timeshare company in India, then shouldn't the article be primarily about the Indian timeshare industry, and only mention Club Mahindra Holiday as the first such company? Mojei (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Quite possibly. If the article doesn't improve it's highly likely it'll be nominated for deletion, and I'd certainly consider supporting or suggesting that the article be deleted and replaced with a generic article about the Indian timeshare industry. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 16:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

not sure it is correct way of leaving comments/information ..

Mahindra Holidays them self report that they have 70 consumer cases. Ref: Draft Red Herring Prospectus filed with SEBI by the Mahindra Holidays http://www.sebi.gov.in/dp/mahindraholidays.pdf

Holidays and resorts firm (Mahindra Holidays) to refund membership fee http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Chandigarh/Holidays-and-resorts-firm-to-refund-membership-fee/articleshow/4390164.cms

New Report from Indian Express "Club Mahindra fined for ‘misleading customer'" http://www.indianexpress.com/news/club-mahindra-fined-for-misleading-customer/590269/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poonamvarshney (talk • contribs) 17:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Club Mahindra Holidays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101214015724/http://clubmahindra.com/IR_files/Investor%20Presentation%20MHRIL_H1_F11.pdf to http://www.clubmahindra.com/IR_files/Investor%20Presentation%20MHRIL_H1_F11.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Article condition - "no consensus"

The article was nominated for AfD in January, but was ended abruptly with a "no consensus" conclusion, which means "with no effect on the article's status" per WP:NotEarly. So, let's discuss here what we can do about it instead of taking self-generated actions like merging. Thanks 1.186.41.86 (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)