Talk:Coadjutor bishop

Relevance of Turku?

To me, the position of Bishop of Turku does not seem at all relevant to Coadjutor Bishops. In Anglican terms, the role is similar to that of a suffragan bishop (or assistant bishop), who assists a diocesan bishop, often over a defined geographical area, but has no expectation of succeeding to the main see. There is an even more direct parallel in the office of the Suffragan Bishop of Dover, who is also called "Bishop in Canterbury" and runs the diocese of Canterbury on behalf of the Primate. Myopic Bookworm 16:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

If anything, the Bishop of Turku should go in an article about auxiliaries or suffragans, unless someone can show that the bishop has a right of succession and not just a mere likelihood or that in the usage of the church the bishop is referred to as "coadjutor". From the text removed from the article, it seems that neither of these are the case. Pmadrid 22:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

To point out a technicality: the "coadjutor" post is not inherently linked to succession. Before the new code of Canon Law, a coadjutor need not (and often didn't) have the right of succession, and in theory someone else might have without being coadjutor. Today, with the enhanced understanding of the role of bishop, a bright line has been established between anauxiliary who is also VG and a true coadjutor. I'm not familiar with the Turku Lutheran situation, however just because he does or doesn't have a right of succession doesn't mean he is or isn't a coadjutor -- that's a separate issue. HarvardOxon 03:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that is correct that coadjutor is not historically linked to succession. My point, however, is that since it is now linked to succession post 1983 code it would be a saving point that would allow an office not specifically called "coadjutor" to appear in this article. Pmadrid 05:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

In fact, this article could use a history of the coadjutor in addition to the current explanation of its modern usage. Pmadrid 05:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coadjutor bishop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100115203240/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P1F.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P1F.HTM
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100115203240/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P1F.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P1F.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)