Talk:Coat of arms of Bavaria

angles

Are the angles of the fusils authoritatively specified anywhere? —Tamfang (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think so. Here lists extracts from Law, and that doesn't say anything. In fact, the word fusil is probably pushing the definition. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 21:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

the blazon says in bend, which means they are angled as opposed to the arms of Monaco. Tinynanorobots (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the long diagonal of each pane ought to be roughly parallel with a bend. I meant the angles between the edges of any one pane. —Tamfang (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Why are they called fusils and not rhombs, since rhombs are the direct translation of "Rauten". 82.135.74.41 (talk) 13:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Palatinate Arms

The lion of the Electoral Palatinate has a red crown, where the one in the state arms has none, making them not identical. Also, unlike other German arms, this one does not use heraldic courtesy. Tinynanorobots (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Old Coat of arms of Wittelsbach family

There is a sentence in the history sections which stated "Gules, a golden fess dancetty on a blue shield". Now anyone knowing anything about heraldry will notice immediately this is completely wrong and confusing. The first word "gules" means "red" and refers to the shield in general so the first paragraph of the sentence "gules, a fess dancetty" would mean: "red shield, a horizontal golden zig-zag line" but then it continues "on a blue shield", so how can this be? Is the shield blue or red? Anyway I've corrected this and replaced "gules" with "azure" since the latter refers to the blue color. We have the coa's of Scheyern and Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm who claim to use the old arms of the Wittelsbacher before they adopted those by the Counts of Bogen, today widely recognized as the white and blue fussils. Shokatz (talk) 08:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Could it be a plain blue field with a red inescutcheon? —Tamfang (talk) 00:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

If that was the case then it would say escutcheon which in this case is not mentioned. The description was most likely a mistake made by clumsy editing or something similar.Shokatz (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coat of arms of Bavaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001030735/http://www.fotw.net/Flags/de-by_lx.html to http://www.fotw.net/Flags/de-by_lx.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020131746/http://www.bayern.de:80/English-.594.20473/index.htm to http://www.bayern.de/English-.594.20473/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)