Talk:Coenonympha nipisiquit

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Contradict

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Taxobox: Coenonympha tullia nipisiquit

Text: Coenonympha nipisiquit

This needs some recent study on phylogeny and/or systematics and/or taxonomy if there is one (it may be there has been recent change of opinion/evidence), and a basic (secondary) RS for the whole article is needed anyway. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contradiction removed. Appears that it is now considered a separate species. Dger (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coenonympha nipisiquit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419013625/http://www.accdc.com/butterflyatlas/Maritime%20Ringlet.pdf to http://www.accdc.com/butterflyatlas/Maritime%20Ringlet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic