Wikipedia

Talk:Columbia, Missouri/Archive 1

< Talk:Columbia, Missouri
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Grey Wanderer in topic Shooting....
Archive 1

Heart of Little Dixie

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed: Columbia lies in the Heart of Little Dixie Region of Missouri. It is a term not used by the inhabitants of the region, and it is also inconsistent with the other Missouri city articles that don't state what region they are in. If anything it is a historical note, as it has little impact on how one locates the city today, for Columbians would use the term Mid-Missouri. As the opening is already quite full I think its best for the reasons above to remove it. Grey Wanderer | Talk 05:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Opening Paragraph

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Over time the opening paragraph had picked up a lot of random information and become disorganized, I've moved some stuff around and added quite a few sources. I also created a section for politics because there was a mass of info on it that had just grown over time. I hope it works for everyone. Grey Wanderer 10:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

To hell with the opening paragraph, I cleaned up the whole page, feel free to mess around with my occasionally poor syntax. Grey Wanderer 13:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone want to write anything concerning Columbia's expansion? I have lived here for three years and love it. It makes me somewhat sad though when I see trees being cut down and open land being torn up for ugly cookie-cutter houses. I am not anti-development (I'm all for the South of town and peripheral developments), but part of the charm of central columbia is its abundance of open land and forest land. I come from a large city with a singular lack of trees. I would hate to see Columbia go the same way. Perhaps if the city government was as progressive as it was made out, more land would be protected from development. An example of all this is the formerly Green, Meadows area.

That doesn't sound NPOV. 12.216.240.130 02:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The District

Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

I just wanted to point out that the downtown area is not known as "The District", or at least it wasn't two years ago when I left. It was right around that time that somebody, probably in the chamber of commerce or something, got the idea that downtown needed to be called the district and I can remember joking around with a friend about how stupid that was. Downtown is simply downtown for any local. And it seems to me that a few sentences of this article read like they were written by maybe that same person in the Chamber of Commerce. Also, I would say that the majority of students are not local. Most come from St. Louis, K.C., the Lake area, or other parts of the state. During the summer months, the effects of the students' absence is easily felt in the traffic density around town. DustinG 14:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I can confirm this as well. I have not lived there for going on 6 years but I did live there for 22 years before that and can't imagine calling downtown 'the district'. Dalf | Talk 09:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, I live here and go downtown pretty often and the only time and no one who actually goes there calls it the district. Sometimes OFFICIAL type things call it the district, but that's the only time i can think of downtown as the district.
I can further confirm this. I live downtown, on 5th street south of Broadway. The push to call it the district is pretty strong by the downtown association, excuse me, The District (tm) association. But it largely hasn't caught on. I suppose if they try long enough... Details of their intents are at www.downtowncolumbia.org (It'll redirect to the new name :)
After going home for xmass I can further confrim this. I did hear it called The District once on the radio so I asked my family about it. They scoffed. I suppose new commers to town might be convinced to use the new name but for people who have been there for very long it just does not fit. Dalf | Talk 08:30, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Yea there's a big push for "The District" that the locals (like me) hate. In 5 years it'll either be entreched or forgotten. The City Council is trying the whole "Branding" thing here ... like "Westport" or "The Plaza" is to Kansas City.
We might actually ad a section about this push. If you read their webpage its really quite silly they avoide the use of the term down town even when describing what area The District is in they say "Columbia's central city" and they bold and italic The District with every use even in the middle of sentences. I think we could add a (short) section about the effort (and that it is apparently lead by bussness in the area) with links to Brand management and Brand. Dalf | Talk 00:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

It looks like The District" initiative is finally working, people are starting to refer to downtown that way, and business now advertise by saying located in the district Grey Wanderer 20:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, businesses like Shakespeare's that had a big deal to do with the 'name change' advertise such. Fact is, no one besides a few select business owners calls it 'the district' with a straight face. I'll find some article about the majority of downtowner's disdain for it.Rubyredstarfruit 05:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I live in Columbia, have done for 3 years. I hate the "District" title, but it seems slowly to be sticking. I hear it a lot on the radio and TV at any rate. Must admit I have not heard many people refer to downtown as the District in conversation.

Columbia recently added expensive blue signs directing visitors to downtown landmarks. All of these are branded with "The District" logo. It's here to stay.

Seasonal population

Latest comment: 17 years ago12 comments6 people in discussion

Anyone have a source for the figure of 120,000 seasonal population? I believe students are included in the census numbers. Adam 08:12, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm deleting this since I can't find anything to support it elsewhere. Adam 03:06, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
I grew up there and that is the number I had always heard. Students are counted as living whereever they actually live, (some times as residents of other states). They are not all counted as local population. Dalf | Talk 18:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Looking at the Census info for columbia its pretty clear that they do not count students as residents (as subtracting people over 65, people under 18, and people with degrees from the total population gives a number less than the current enroolment at MU). However it is not clear what % of the students at MU are not local (I suspct the majority of them are local). The 120k number IS a number that just about anyone living there will give you but I have on more than one occasion tried to verify it with no success. I suspect the seasonal number is 100k but again I don't have a source so I won't put either number back into the article. Dalf | Talk 18:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
College students are counted, according to this discussion. Pertinent info, cited from Census forms: College students living away from home while attending college: Counted where they are living at college and ...the normal form (the one that would go to the other homes of college students) specifically instructs the person who fills out the form not to include students away at college. Polpo 17:44, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
It looks like the 120,000 figure is back. I am removing it as it's pure speculation and most likely false, due to the fact that both resident and nonresident college students are counted in the census. However, being a student at Mizzou in 2000, I can report that I did not receive a census form. In any case, I am updating the page with an estimated city population from [1] and MSA population from [2].

Polpo 20:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

As I outline above the census does NOT count all the students as simple math (show above can prove). However the 120k number (which will be given to you by all residents of the town) does need some sort of source. I think we should leave some mention of seasonal population form the students but not provide a number as the fact that there is some diffrence is easily sourced. Dalf | Talk 02:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Your changes are fine. Dalf | Talk 02:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean, but when I make the calculations you suggest above (total pop - under 18s - over 65s - degree holders) I get 37541, which is well in excess of the current enrollment numbers at Mizzou, even though you're double-subtracting degree holders over 65. I would also dispute the assertion that "all residents of the town" will give you the 120k figure, speaking as a lifelong resident of the town.  ;) Note also Polpo's link above to the official Census rules (though of course some undercount is always possible with Census numbers). Adam 00:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I don't know where people are looking but this is OFFICIAL- college students are counted as living where they are going to college, whether living on campus or in an apartment. Yes, this causes problems where their parents may list them on forms as living back home, it is a controversy of college students being counted twice while homeless are undercounted. The metropolitan area does NOT include Howard county, ONLY Boone. Please refer to the census bureau for more information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.78.243.25 (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC).

Yeah we aren't using the 120k figure though it may be true, seeing as how most college students don't seem to get a census form from my experience. Howard county, however is in the Columbia MSA, Its on the census website. Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

If a college student lives on campus in a dorm they would not recieve a form since it would be taken care of by the college itself. That could be part of why people think students are not counted. Very few people as a percentage actually get a form in the mail (in fact NO ONE with only a PO Box gets a form) most are done on a door-to-door basis. The census bureau counts students as living at where they live at college, this is a fact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.78.243.24 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC).

To add more confusion to the issue, I was a student living in the dorms during the 2000 census, and we did have a census worker come by. She made it clear that we should fill the forms out as living in Columbia, since we were going to school there (i.e., living there at the time). She also told us to make sure our parents didn't claim us on their forms, so as not to double count. For what it's worth . . .

Marijuana

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The population generally supports progressive causes, examples of this being the recent decriminilization of marijuana and the extensive city recycling programs. This is in the article, but I never heard anything about this... Wouldn't something this major be well known? I just want to make sure I'm not missing anything before I take it down, 'cause it looks like a prank to me. Is it? 147.174.150.24 14:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Sean

It's for real. See the second and third paragraphs of this article, for example. The ordinance basically decriminalizes medical use of marijuana (at least at the municipal level) and says that anyone caught with less than 35 grams must be tried in municipal court, with a maximum fine of $250. Adam 03:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
(That's municipal rather than county(?)/state/federal, part of the idea being that state/federal convictions can result in students losing financial aid, whereas a conviction in municipal court will not -- at least that's how I understand it.) Adam 03:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, then I'm going to edit the article slightly to reflect the fact that it isn't all out pot freedom. 147.174.150.24 05:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Sean

What are thoughts about removing the blurb on "decriminalization of cannabis"? I think there are better "progressive causes" to document than getting stoned.

Meh...I think its certainly notable even if its not flattering. Grey Wanderer | Talk 05:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Pictures

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

uhm, if anyone thinks we need more pictures of anything in Columbia (especially downtown, i do so love downtown), I can probably take some --Eel 22:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

I really think we could use some good pictures of the city or MU. Anyone have any? 147.174.150.24 06:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Sean
There are some pictures for ya. Grey Wanderer | Talk 10:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but they've goofed up the formatting for the entire page. 12.216.240.130 13:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
They may have goofed it up on your screen, but depending on your browser, resolution, and screen size it will look different, making the pictures smaller is fine, but the pano really messes up things where you moved it. Grey Wanderer | Talk 05:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Is anyone interested in participating in a Wikiproject concerning Columbia? I believe we still have a great deal of information that we can expand upon, and getting good media is better with lots of people. Please reply if you are interested. Theprosperonight 14:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Sounds great, your right there is alot more we can do. I'm in. Grey_Wanderer 23:02, 13 september 2006 (UTC)
Here's a start. We just need to get a good group of editors in. Wikipedia:WikiProject Columbia, Missouri Theprosperonight 10:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


Music Scene

Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

We've got a progressive psychedelic heavy metal scene? I was not aware of this. In other words, I disagree. Even if I had no idea what Columbia was, I'd doubt that just because it's so specific. Then again, I guess I haven't listened to a LOT of those bands, so perhaps I'm not the most qualified to judge. Opinions? --Eel 01:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I would say we have progressive indie and alt scene. psychedelic...no so much. I plan at some point to remove the music scene section from the main article and give it its own as part of WikiProject Columbia, Missouri. Grey Wanderer 20:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree. I saw this and thought that it smacked of self-promotion. The indie scene seems to be the only thing even worth mentioning, since the only acts that tour or play industry showcases seems to be Bald Eagle and The Foundry Field Recordings. Mywhitedevil 06:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

In the "Popular Music Scene" article I think the "Other notable acts are:" part should either get it's own wikipedia article or have it's own section. I think the list is too long to be in the middle of the paragraph like that.

I went ahead and gave the other notable bands it's own category, I think it looks much better that way. Me5000 05:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't think this list accurately reflects the Columbia scene anymore. I can think of quite a few local bands that are just as notable as most of those on the list, but they aren't listed: Fare Thee Well (just won Clash of the Titans), Caulfield and the Magic (has a release on Hometone records), Umbros (several self-released albums), Barn Owl (self-released EP, plays a lot), Brunette, The Pale Family, The Stingrays (Hometone), John Henry & The Engine (Hometone), The Goldbugs (Hometone)... Plus Dadbot and Ellie Come Home are defunct now as far as I know, and I thought Warhammer48k moved to Chicago? 128.206.141.23 16:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The criteria for the list just seems to be if the band is local and known locally(I actually haven't heard of most of the bands on the list). So I think you can add any local bands you think are notable. I think it might be best to just get rid of the list, though, and only list bands that are known nationally. Me5000 17:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Famous People

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Famous people need to be individuals who are known outside the local area. I've removed several people who would be unknown outside Columbia (e.g., Hindman, Gervino) and people who should logically appear on the Mizzou page (e.g., the coaches). 12.216.240.130 14:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Totally agree on the MU people, but Hindman is on the board of directors for several state-wide organizations, and perhaps the most well-known non-motorized transportation advocate in the state. Grey Wanderer | Talk 08:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I reinserted Hindman, and removed people like Brand Pitt, who only went to college in Columbia. These people are all listed on the MU alumni page. Grey Wanderer | Talk 08:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Economy

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I noticed many citys have an Economy section which discusses the major businesses in the town and may include a list of major employers. The Columbia page mentions some employers here and there, but there is no section for this. Anyone think such a section would be worthwhile? HornColumbia 05:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

It could be. Many cities do have such a section. The page could mention that if you have a good job in Columbia you are likely:

a) in medicine b) in insurance c) in education d) a lawyer

The University of Missouri is probably the major employer with its campus and hospitals (it owns University Hospital, Ellis Fischel, Columbia Regional Hospital, Rusk Rehab Center). Then there is State Farm and Shelter Insurance also among the city's big employers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.167.246.147 (talk • contribs)

Yeah, it would certainly be worth doing. Grey Wanderer | Talk 05:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Video Games

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Should these be mentioned: http://blogs.columbiatribune.com/gameover/ and http://www.shortattentiongamer.com/? They are both based in Columbia and I think they both have a lot of fans. I thought video game things like this might be a growing thing in Columbia. Me5000 05:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Maybe Slackers deserves a mention too? I wrote up articles for all three, I'm just waiting for some input, since it might be considered advertising. Me5000 17:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd say go for slackers its a decent sized midwest franchise that was founded in Columbia, but don't do the blogs as that would probably be considered advertising and spam. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Game Over isn't just a blog it's a weekly column, and Short Attention Gamer is a podcast and forum. Just to be clear I was proposing they be added to the Columbia article not creating separate articles for them. Me5000 18:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Shakespeare's

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The song "Whiskey Bottle," by Uncle Tupelo, is rumored to be about the city of Columbia, as it makes specific reference to a sign which used be displayed on a Columbia tackle shop sign which read "Liquor, Guns, and Ammo." The sign is now displayed at the downtown location of the world-famous Shakespeare's."

This is in the "Popular Music Scene" section, I bolded the important part. Is Shakespeare's really world-famous? I love their pizza and it's pretty well-known in Missouri, but as far as I know outside of Missouri nobody has really heard of it. Me5000 17:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Population accuracies

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It says the population is 96,700 as of 2007 with this page [3] as a source, but I can't find anything about the population there. There is this page for the population as of 2006 [4]. Then it says the Metropolitan Statistical Area is 153,283 with this as a source [5], but that seems to be from 2005. With the sentence worded the way it is I think it would be assumed both are for 2007. I found statistics for MSA as of 2006 here [6]. Me5000 18:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I guess I didn't really explain why I put this on the talk page. I did a search and 2006 was the most recent population statistics I could find for the city and the MSA. Unless someone has a 2007 source for either I'm going to change it to as of 2006. Me5000 23:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that, the 96,700 figure is from an old estimate and a source that no longer exist, I forgot to change it in the lead paragraph when I changed it in the infobox. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Radio

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I saw the radio section got deleted because of all the external links, most of these stations have pages on wikipedia we just need to find them. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

I restored the radio stations on wikipedia (or at least the ones I could find). Here are the ones I couldn't find on wikipedia that were on the list: KBIA, BUZZ, BXR, KOQL (q106.1), KATI, KCLR, KCMQ, KWOS, KSSZ. Me5000 22:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Main photo

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I'm thinking that we should use something different than a photo of Jesse Hall and the Columns for the top photo on this article. I'm having a hard time thinking of a place or image that symbolizes Columbia to me, though. Any ideas? Polpo 00:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I kinda agree, what we really need is a 'skyline' shot from the east that shows the tiger hotel, jesse hall, memorial union, and paquin tower. Problem is I don't know where we would get one thats not copyrighted. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I always thought an aerial picture would be nice, but there is no way of getting one without flying in a helicopter. If someone had a good picture of downtown, that might work. Me5000 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Columbia skyline

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I added a skyline picture, tell me what you think! I uploaded 3 versions, and of the 3 I found this one to be the best.

Here are all of the pictures I uploaded:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CoMoSkyline.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CoMoSkyline2.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CoMoSkyline3.jpg Me5000 00:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I could upload some unedited versions too and let someone else crop them if these don't work. Me5000 00:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Pics that are needed

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

I've been working on moving the article to FA-status, and we're closer now with recent GA promotion, but I think some specific pics would help out. I don't have a camera or very good photography skills so if anyone wants to take these here is a list, off the top of my head:

  • For the Laws and Government section a pic of city hall(Daniel Boone Building).
  • For the Economy section a pic of Shelter Insurance, or State Farm Insurance.
  • For the Cityscape section a pic of ninth street or downtown/
  • For the Infrastructure section a pic of the I-70/63 interchange or/and Columbia Regional Airport
  • Also generally, we're lacking on pics of commercial areas and historic neighborhoods like Steward road and East Campus.

Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I can take some of these pictures once I get back in town and when the weather is permitting(at least two weeks from now). I think I might already have a picture of city hall- is that at the opposite end of the street that the columns are on? Are there columns in front of that building? Breakyunit (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Great! anything you can do would be appreciated. The building your thinking of is the Boone County Courthouse, which could be used as well. City Hall is on the northeast corner of the intersection of Broadway and 7th street. Its a five story converted hotel (Daniel Boone Hotel).Grey Wanderer | Talk 12:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you still need it, but here is a pic of the courthouse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CourthouseCoMo.jpg Me5000 (talk) 03:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, your pic inspired me to create Boone County Courthouse (Missouri) and I've added it to the Boone County, Missouri page as well. Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thinking of ways to improve the article

Latest comment: 16 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

I was re-reading the article and have thought of some things we could do to perhaps improve the article.

  • I think the section on neighborhoods could use some more information about some neighborhoods specifically (maybe the four National Historic Districts within the city: Downtown Columbia, East Campus, Francis Quadrangle, and North Ninth Street).
  • Under education, not much information specific to any of the schools. Perhaps a little bit about what makes the different schools special. Didn't Hickman win the state football game a few years back? Are the other schools unique in any way?
  • Maybe in the sports section we could talk about the other college athletics that people attend (such as baseball). Also, are there any non-Mizzou sports in Columbia worth noting?
  • It says that "Columbia's hospitals and supporting facilities are a major referral center for the state"- could we be more specific about the role Columbia's health care serves in Missouri? I think that the University research reactor makes radioactive nuclides used in nuclear medicine in other areas (such as St. Louis), maybe we could mention that. Also, what sort of trauma center the University hospital is, number of employees, the new orthopedic (I think) center being built. Seems like there is more to talk about here.
  • As for transportation, we don't mention the MKT Railroad depot that is now destroyed. Now that I think about it, maybe this would be better in the History of Columbia, Missouri article, but I thought about it just now. Maybe say that we used to have trains, but no longer do or something. Also, maybe mention transportation offered (Doc and Norm?) to and from the St. Louis and Kansas City airports.
  • Finally, there is only information about print media and not about radio or television. Student channels on both should be mentioned I think and maybe relate that to the journalism school or something. Any magazines centered on or in Columbia?

Its a lot easier to say what needs to be done than it is to actually do it, so I will try to make some of the additions I have suggested in the near future. I think there is a lot we can do to add to the article. I am not very keen on grammar and writing style, but perhaps someone who is could assess the article's readability or something. Breakyunit (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I think everything you've said above is probably worth implementing, I'd be happy to copy-edit any additions you make, and I'll try to get started on some myself in a few days.Grey Wanderer | Talk 12:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright, that sounds great. I just thought of one other thing that could go under Economy- I was told once that Columbia is a great place to start a restaurant or something about restaurants. I'll have to look into that and find a source, but thought I'd mention it in case it rang any bells. Breakyunit (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

There was a study done several years ago that mentioned Columbia as one of the best places to open a restaurant. A whole listing of those types of awards can be found here. Is it ok if I add you to the "maintained box" on the top of this page?Grey Wanderer | Talk 12:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. I'll read that in more detail later when I'm not too tired. Yes you can add me to the "maintained box", thanks for asking. Breakyunit (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The Show-Me State Games are definitely worth mentioning, according to this article it had more participants than any other state game in 2004. The COLT Railroad may also be worth mentioning under transportation. Me5000 (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Good idea with the Show-Me State Games, Me5000. I didn't use the article you cited because I found ones that were more recent, but the article you stated might have some useful information about the economic impact of the games. Is there anything else we could add at the moment to the "Sports" section? I was thinking about crossing off the items in the list I created above as I/we address them. Breakyunit (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Note about citations

Latest comment: 16 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

It would be very much appreciated if everyone did website citations in this format: <ref>{{cite web | url= | title= | work= | accessdate=}}</ref>, here is a guide in case you're not sure what goes in each section. Here is a list of all the citation templates if the reference isn't from a website. Thank you. Me5000 (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, the article will be quick failed with all the citations aren't in the same format.Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. I had no idea- I still consider myself relatively new to editing. Breakyunit (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I just wanted to thank both of you guys, and the random editors who have made one or two edits, for the drive to improve the page. As much as I do on Wikipedia, this is the first time I've really been involved with hard-working and active editors really intent on bring a page to FA-status.Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I was wondering how to cite the newly added info under Health Care that says "a physician density that is about 3 times the United States average". I cited two sources that I got that info from, but that's not the whole story. One source says how many physicians Columbia has and the other is data on the physician density in the U.S. There is a third source here that says what the physician density is in the U.S. until 2004. There is a significant increase from 2004 to 2005 between the sources, so I'm not sure which is correct hence the "about" in the article. Finally, I just took the amount of physicians in Columbia divided by the population given in this article to find Columbia's physician density- 8.48 physicians per 1000 people. How can I say all this in an in text citation? Breakyunit (talk) 23:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I have no idea, sorry. I think the people at the help desk will know the answer, though. Me5000 (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You may be able to do it somehow (I don't know how) and I think it is good information to include, but watch out for WP:OR.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I kept that in mind, but I don't know how dividing two numbers to get a new number then using the new number in an article is "research". I put the question here, but no responses yet. --Breakyunit (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

History sections

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

It is my understanding that some have suggested cutting some from the history paragraph in the intro and some from the history section.

I think changing these two sentences (which are in the intro) "In 1818 a group of settlers, incorporated under the Smithton Land Company, purchased over 2,000 acres (8 km²) and established the village of Smithton less than a mile from current day downtown Columbia. In 1821 the settlers moved, because of lack of water, across the Flat Branch to the plateau between the Flat Branch and Hinkson creeks in what is now the downtown district."
into
"In 1821 a group of settlers incorporated under the Smithton Land Company moved from their nearby village, because of lack of water, across the Flat Branch to the plateau that is now the downtown district."
or even
"In 1821 a group of settlers moved from their nearby village, because of lack of water, across the Flat Branch to the plateau that is now the downtown district."
since it is just the intro and the first sentence as it is in the article doesn't tell us much about Columbia itself.

In the History section, I propose changing these sentences: "In 1678 La Salle claimed all of Missouri for France." →Is inconsequential in this context and doesn't tell us much about Columbia, I think it can be removed.
"In 1806, Daniel Boone and his sons established a salt lick 40 miles (64 km) northwest of Columbia. The Booneslick Trail wound from Kentucky through St. Charles, Missouri to the salt lick." →This info doesn't seem to add much because the next sentence doesn't say that these trails were responsible for settlement. If they were responsible, then maybe the next sentence should attest to the significance of these two sentences.
"In addition, the now defunct Silvey Insurance was once a large local employer." →I don't know if this is important enough to include in this article.

What do you guys think? --Breakyunit (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I about to may a couple cuts, using a hybrid of your suggestion, let me know what you think.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I think the intro is better now. Do you think it is easiest to read the way its divided up? The second paragraph sorta covers two things- history and economy/education. Just an idea, but maybe we could reorganize it like this.
Columbia was settled in Pre-Columbian times by the mound building, Mississippian culture of Native Americans. In 1818 a group of settlers, incorporated under the Smithton Land Company, purchased over 2,000 acres (8 km²) and established the village of Smithton near present-day downtown Columbia. In 1821 the settlers moved and re-named the settlement Columbia—a poetic name for the United States. The founding of the University of Missouri in 1839 established the city as a center of education and research. By 1851 two other institutions of higher education, Stephens College and Columbia College were established within the city.
Located in the foothills of the Ozark Mountains, Columbia is equidistant from St. Louis and Kansas City, in a region known as "Mid-Missouri". Today Columbia has a highly diversified economy, and is often ranked highly for its business atmosphere. Never a strong center of industry and manufacturing the city's economic base relies on the education, medical, technology and insurance industries.Studies consistently rank Columbia as a top city in which to live for educational facilities, health care, technological savvy, economic growth, cultural opportunities and cost of living.[16] The city has been ranked as high as the second-best place to live in the United States by Money Magazine's annual list and is regularly in the top 100.[17] People from Columbia are described as "Columbians."
Also, what (if anything) are we going to do with the History section? Are the changes I suggested above alright? I'm not really a great writer, so I'm just throwing this out there. --Breakyunit (talk) 02:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I really think the history section itself is fine, it compares similarly with other FA city articles I've seen. I enacted your intro paragraph suggestion above, I think its quite a bit more concise. Thanks for your work, I love seeing the article get better by the hour.Grey Wanderer | Talk 02:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Demography

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

I'm having some trouble finding the exact statistics in the demography section(I'm not sure that they exist). this source has median household income and per capita income, but nothing about the poverty line or median family income. These sources [7] and [8] Have things about the median age, but some of the statistics aren't in the same format as the demography section(the source has ages 15 and younger instead of 18 and 16 to 24 instead of 18 to 24) . So, is the section going to need to be rewritten some what or are there some sources somewhere that I couldn't find? Me5000 (talk) 02:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I found another source here that has the median family income people under 18, above 18 , and above 65. It also has the % of the population under the poverty line. I'm going to put these sources into the article(without rewriting for now) and see what's left that isn't sourced afterwords. Me5000 (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The following statistics are still unsourced:

  • "In the city the population was spread out with 26.7% from 18 to 24, 28.7% from 25 to 44, 16.2% from 45 to 64"
  • "For every 100 females there were 91.8 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 89.1 males."
  • "Males had a median income of $34,710 versus $26,694 for females."

Mid-Missouri

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I might be wrong, but shouldn't Mid-Missouri be capitalized as it is a proper noun, I was thinking of creating an article for the loosely defined area sometime soon.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 20:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I think its debatable. If you read WP:MOS here it says sometimes regions are proper nouns. The question is whether mid-Missouri is of "uncertain proper-noun status". A google search would make it seem that it is a proper noun because almost all the hits are "Mid-Missouri" but I think they are used as part of the name of those businesses. I found this site that suggests mid-Missouri should not be capitalized(maybe this one site makes the proper noun status uncertain). I think it could be argued either way. I prefer lower case, but I'm not going to make a big deal about it if you disagree. --Breakyunit (talk) 22:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I went ahead and created the article, so its capitalized automatically now. Feel free to change it. Grey Wanderer (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Malformed FAC nom

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I removed a malformed FAC template for a nomination that was never submitted to WP:FAC. Also, per WP:FAC/ar, nominations can be resubmitted once issues raised are addressed. The article previously failed on January 23, and these are all the changes made since then. Perhaps an extensive (at least a month) peer review would help get the article in shape for FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

My bad, I got half way through the nomination process and lost steam. Grey Wanderer (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Congressional district

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article states that COMO is in Missouri's 9th Congressional district, however, that district has been dissolved. The information regarding what Congressional district COMO is in needs to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.216.45 (talk) 03:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Parade Magazine-"America's Hardest Working Town"

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would love to incorporate a nice accolade from Parade Magazine given recently (15 April 2012) to Columbia, MO, but I just don't know how to go about it. Parade named Columbia "America's Hardest Working Town" ([9]) based on "Average hours worked per capita", "Willingness to Work During Personal Time", "Number of Dual-Income Homes", and "Local Employment Rate". What does anyone else think? I would appreciate it if somebody much more able than I could work it in somehow. KyleECronin (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

FA to do list

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tasks remaining to be done to attain FA status:

  • Expand "Climate" section
  • Expand "Economy" section
  • Address navigation boxes in "Media" section
  • Double check refs for reliability and dead links (I've recently added author data to them)

--Millbrooky (talk) 04:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I hope to get to work on this soon...three years later. Grey Wanderer (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Huh?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I heard a needle scratch when I read: "The economy of the metro area is slightly larger than that of the Bahamas." While it's certainly a fun piece of trivia, it conveys no real information regarding Columbia's economy. Unless the Bahaman economy is used as some sort of universal benchmark (which it isn't), there's no connection. There have got to be other Midwestern American cities that would better serve as a comparison, if such a comparison is necessary at all.PacificBoy 00:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Honestly I found that stat in a U.S. Conference of Mayors report and rankings of metro areas compared to countries. I included as to have some sort of comparison of size. But I certainly see your point. Grey Wanderer (talk) 03:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Suggested merger of Government of Columbia, Missouri into the Government and Politics section of this page.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Government and Politics section is an exact duplicate of the other article. Therefore I'm proposing that the aforementioned article is merged into the Government and Politics section of this article.

Dobby22 (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

No opposition to the merger has been raised in seven months, so I have done so. Elassint Hi 03:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Columbia, Missouri/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I've given Columbia, Missouri a B on the quality scale> It could still use some work but, it has come a long way. Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Article was promoted to GA-status on January 5th 2008. Grey Wanderer (talk) 20:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 20:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Columbia, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

The result of the discussion was “Kept: no valid reason for deletion.” Grey Wanderer (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Suggestion for Improvement

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You could include a section about the food culture in Columbia. I believe it is a large part of the downtown scene. Many restaurants have had a long and interesting history in the city. Berry2205 (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

That’s a good idea. I picked up a copy of a new book: Iconic Restaurants of Columbia, Missouri. It was published in 2018 and contains quite a bit of original information on Columbia food culture past and present. With that as a source I should be able to come up with something. Any in particular you were thinking of? Grey Wanderer (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Created Category:Restaurants in Columbia, Missouri. Grey Wanderer (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Broken weather

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi guys. This is a great article and the place sounds great. There's been a broken reference forever, for the NOAA weather data. The current broken name was inserted in 2016 here by CaradhrasAiguo and it was broken even then! I can't imagine why that edit was made. I don't know enough about weather to find a new NOAA source for this city, so can someone else do that? Does Grey Wanderer know? — Smuckola(talk) 04:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay cool, CaradhrasAiguo, how did you fix a named reference that isn't defined in the article just by renaming it? Is it sourced from wikidata or what manner of black magic voodoo is this? :) — Smuckola(talk) 04:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

It is a template transclusion. The issue of avoiding conflicts in reference names (avoiding commonplace names such as NOAA, NCDC, NOWData etc.) was raised in Sep 2016, I likely had been deluding myself that I had already altered the ref name in the template at the same time. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 04:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
@CaradhrasAiguo: Okay, what template? Where do I learn this incantation for other cities? Specifically, Kansas City, Missouri. The weather links are dead. — Smuckola(talk) 04:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
@CaradhrasAiguo: Hi, what's the name? Could I trouble you to fix weather citations on KCMO? thx — Smuckola(talk) 20:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
If, by fixing, you mean corrupted citations, I don't see any there. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Classification of city

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What city class is Columbia Missouri 97.85.242.219 (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Columbia is a home rule/constitutional charter city under Missouri state law. Grey Wanderer (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Shooting....

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Seen this matter on several news outlets. Was this a school shooting or workplace shooting, and can this be used in the article? Everything from KTVO to CNN covered this. Will look into this as well.Thanks. 🥺😘 Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 09:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

All I've found happened in Nov. 2021, according to Google.😯 Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't think you've got the right city, is it possible you meant Columbia, South Carolina? Grey Wanderer (talk) 22:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Columbia,_Missouri/Archive_1&oldid=1205876307"