Talk:Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article should not have been tagged for copyright infringement, as case law is a work of the U.S. government and this article is not a copy of the page cited. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 06:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Also, the phrases found in common between the public domain opinion and this article are mainly legal terms and phrases that need to be used exactly as is or it would typically change the legal meaning.Brianwc (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
editThis article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Intellectual Property law and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)