Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA2
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- For the "Recorded" section, show what year it was recorded followed by a semicolon and a list of studios where it was recorded (Ex: 2009; Studio 1, Studio 2)
- Singles do not need to be sourced in the infobox because they have their own respective articles
Lead
edit- Released on April 25, 2006... → "Released on April 25, 2006 by INO Records..."
Background
edit- No issues
Composition
edit- Two subsections not necessary in this context
Critical reception
edit- No issues
Singles
edit- An album cut from the album, "No More No Less", spent one frame on the Hot Christian Songs chart, debuting and peaking at number thirty..[31] → Get rid of extra period at end of statement
Release
edit- Replace all of the "No."s with "number"
Track listing
edit- No issues
Personnel
edit- No issues
Charts and certifications
edit- No issues
References
edit- If you mention a work or publisher in a reference and it is wiki-linked, do not wiki-link it for further references
- Only italicize publications in the "work=" parameter
- Proofread all of these to ensure errors are not made; for a guideline to follow, use WP:REFERENCE
- Fixed all. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few prose issues, and things mostly just need to be proofread in the references section for this article to pass. I will give you the general seven days to fix mistakes, address points I have made, and/or ask me any questions that you have. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- All issues have now been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)