Talk:Coming Up to Breathe

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Failing article solely because the prose (and WP:MOS issues) is not up to GA standards. Here are a few examples (these are just a few, there maybe even more)

• Coming Up to Breathe is the fifth major label, full-length studio album from MercyMe.
• Released in on April 25, 2006,
• Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews from critics
• "Something Like You" has been compared to the sound of U2 (particularly the song "Where The Streets Have No Name"),[6] while "3:42 a.m. (Writer's Block)" has been described as 'soulful classic rock'

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   "Background" has basically every period cited with FN#1 which makes the article look even more clumsy

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Saying "Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews." is being biased

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Active users have been reverting vandalism, which was last done back in mid November 2011

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Mercyme cutb.jpg does not comply with WP:NFCC; its rational is very very weak and does not give a suitable reasoning on why a non-free artwork gives any educational value. The second file completely fails WP:NFCC.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I suggest you fixed all of these concerns, get it copy edited, allow others to give it a WP:PR and then re-nominate at a later date. Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 23:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• For the "Recorded" section, show what year it was recorded followed by a semicolon and a list of studios where it was recorded (Ex: 2009; Studio 1, Studio 2)
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Singles do not need to be sourced in the infobox because they have their own respective articles
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Lead

• Released on April 25, 2006... → "Released on April 25, 2006 by INO Records..."
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Background

• No issues

Composition

• Two subsections not necessary in this context
  • Done Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Critical reception

• No issues

Singles

• An album cut from the album, "No More No Less", spent one frame on the Hot Christian Songs chart, debuting and peaking at number thirty..[31] → Get rid of extra period at end of statement
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Release

• Replace all of the "No."s with "number"
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Track listing

• No issues

Personnel

• No issues

Charts and certifications

• No issues

References

• If you mention a work or publisher in a reference and it is wiki-linked, do not wiki-link it for further references
• Only italicize publications in the "work=" parameter
• Proofread all of these to ensure errors are not made; for a guideline to follow, use WP:REFERENCE
  • Fixed all. Toa Nidhiki05 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few prose issues, and things mostly just need to be proofread in the references section for this article to pass. I will give you the general seven days to fix mistakes, address points I have made, and/or ask me any questions that you have. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

All issues have now been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 01:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Untitled

Can you please contact Oshwah or another administrator to protect this page if I ever keep reverting edits, Binksternet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Better Than My Life (talk • contribs) 20:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)