Wikipedia

Talk:Commonwealth citizen

Latest comment: 4 years ago by BlueMoonset in topic GA Review
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is an Overseas Citizen of India considered a Commonwealth citizen by the United Kingdom? JDM1991 (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Does India have more than one category of citizenship? Frenchmalawi (talk) 04:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

overhaul needed

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article needs a major overhaul for it to be an article about "Commonwealth citizenship"; a concept that appears to exist in at least a dozen countries. If it is just an article about UK law, it needs to be restyled. Frenchmalawi (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commonwealth citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Commonwealth citizen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 18:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hi! I'll be reviewing this article over the next few days. starsandwhales (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


  • There's contradictory information when the article states that a Commonwealth Citizen is a national or citizen of any commonwealth country, but later states that Indian nationals who are not citizens are not Commonwealth Citizens.
    • Changed phrasing in lead and acquisition section.
  • Can there be more depth discussing the rights and duties associated with being a Commonwealth Citizen? Perhaps a section for the privileges granted in each member state.
    • Hmm I'm not sure what you'd want for this. There's not that much that the status confers on a person outside of the UK, and I think I laid that out in prose already. What do you find lacking? I don't think a table of benefits would be useful here if that's what you're suggesting since there's so many member states that don't really distinguish between foreigners and Commonwealth citizens other than just by the name.
      • What is traveling like? What is immigration like? What kinds of travel documents do you need? Do you need a visa? Do you just need proof of being a Commonwealth citizen?
      • Do commonwealth citizens have the right to work? The right to own property?
      • Maybe a mention of how in most contexts Commonwealth citizens are treated as if foreigners (if that's the case) if there really isn't anything else to say.
        • Added a line saying that there's no free movement or labour and most member countries just treat Commonwealth citizens as if they were foreigners.
  • In the Acquisition and loss section it discusses that it is automatic when one is a citizen of a Commonwealth country, but then lists exceptions. It would be clearer if Schedule 3 was mentioned first in that section, and then the article clarified what that means.
    • Tweaked phrasing in lead and acquisition should help.
  • Does commonwealth citizenship follow the member country's laws or the UK's laws for citizenship inheritance?
    • Commonwealth citizenship isn't passed on or acquired by any rules other than just being a citizen of a member state.
      • In Acquisition and loss could you mention that?
        • Added that explicitly.
  • Can you add a map that highlights all of the nations on the Schedule 3 list?
    • Added.
  • "citizens from other Commonwealth states are entitled to certain rights, including eligibility to vote in elections and serve in government positions" in certain countries? or all of them?
    • Added number of countries for voting.


Thanks for reviewing, Horserice (talk) 20:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Starsandwhales: Gentle nudge for feedback. Horserice (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sorry things have been really busy lately. The earliest I'll be able to get back to this is in 2 weeks. If you would like a second reviewer I can do that. starsandwhales (talk) 04:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
No worries at all. Yeah, a second reviewer would be great. Always good to get more eyes for feedback. Horserice (talk) 07:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Horserice: Noticed the request for a second pair of eyes, and had a read through to see if I could assist. Some things I thought were worth considering, from first (and second/third) pass review are:

  • Where more than one reference is given at the end of a sentence, it can look untidy. A great way to deal with this is to group these references, so the references are nested in just one reference holder.
  • The thumbnail infographic on Commonwealth countries in the Acquisition and loss section could be added to the article info-box instead, to ground the text that follows.
  • Some references are linked to limited access resources, which makes online verification difficult (while this is sometimes unavoidable, particularly for some types of references, adding a more accessible secondary source can assist).
  • Some parts of the background section didn’t flow as easily as those in other sections, so you may wish to re-examine that section.
  • You may find Mann’s work of interest [1] and this little overview of the Australian history relevant to this [2]. It might be worth mentioning the 1926 Balfour Declaration and the 1947 British Commonwealth Conference on Nationality and Citizenship in the background section.

Hope that is of some assistance to you. I think the core is sound and the above are things you can consider in advancing this article. Kangaresearch 08:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Closing comment

edit

Both the nominator Starsandwhales and reviewer Horserice have abandoned this nomination, and Horserice never did make any edits after Kangaresearch graciously had posted a second opinion. I posted on Horserice's talk page and gave until the end of August for a response here (or there), noting that my assumption would be a lack of interest to continue if nothing was heard. Since nothing was, I am closing this nomination as unsuccessful. A new nomination is welcome once the issues raised have been addressed, though if so I hope there will be better follow-through. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Commonwealth_citizen&oldid=1200133537"