Talk:Conquests of the Longbow: The Legend of Robin Hood

Untitled

Is anyone opposed to restoring the stub tag? I want to do this because many larger articles are still stubs and contain incomplete information (ex. The Legend of Kyrandia); surely more can be said about CotL than what's here. Cromag 19:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

• This article is far from complete or any satisfying. You are welcome to contribute :). Pictureuploader 08:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Actually, I haven't played much of CotL; all I did was walk around, practice archery and talk to some of the characters :). I intend to complete the game someday, but I'll only do so once I find a way to play it with sound (my sound card doesn't support SoundBlaster for some reason). Until then, I can only add to the article through research. I'm adding the stub tag, then.Cromag 18:30, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• My all-time favorite game, beaten 3 times, I could write tons of pages about this fantasy and history puzzle/riddle/fighting/situational/strategy epic potpourri of different moods. I even wrote to Mrs. Marx asking how She came up with such diverse game structure. Personally I think that even if the description is very short it's pretty exaustive and explanatory Mmm I reckon some parts were added after the messages here? Gylfi 00:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

• • Please feel free and improve and expand this article then :)) Pictureuploader 09:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
    • And so I will, Yet I repeat I find it pretty explanatory even tho short. I would mostly just fatten it with more words but not any more clarification on the gameplay of CotL... but I'll still see if it's lacking somewhereGylfi 23:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
      • The point is not to fatten it with words but arrange it better in sections and add more details and trivia. Look Conquests of Camelot, Codename: ICEMAN and the Larry games articles to get an idea. Pictureuploader 09:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
    • If you mean you want l33tness and polishness I have no idea how to do that, the references, links, pics and all the wiki encoding that gives me headache, things wiki-freaks dribble at ... besides I still think most of the stuff in Conquests of Camelot article is just ordinary redundant page-filler. I'll see what I can add, anyway, and I'll leave deco to someone else :) Gylfi 02:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Alternatively, you could write the prose on a separate subpage of your user page and someone with a better understanding of Wiki encoding can integrate it into the article. Cromag 05:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)