Talk:Coral reef restoration
 | A fact from Coral reef restoration appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Hello! My name is Maggi Brisbin and I was asked to serve as an expert reviewer for your new page on Coral Reef Restoration. I am a postdoc at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts and previously Worked in Okinawa where coral conservation was one of my research and personal interests. I am really excited to provide a review for your page - it is fabulous that you have added a reef restoration page to Wikipedia.
Overall there is a lot of great information included in your article and there are quite a few references provided. I think a shift in the organization could improve the article and really help readers find the information they are looking for. I am providing a few suggestions below.
1. The introduction section (above the contents box) should be more focused on the topic of the page - coral reef restoration. As it stands, the intro is more focused on the coral reef structure and biology. I would try defining different types of restoration in the introduction, such as fragmentation vs recruitment and different types of artificial reefs. Artificial Reef actually has an extensive page already and it would be great to link that in here.
2. I think it is great that you give an overview of threats to coral reefs and provide a lot of wikilinks on to more information on the different threats. Currently, it looks like you may be planning on expanding this section because it is broken out into subheadings. I would recommend the opposite, consolidate it into one short paragraph with lots of links. The topic of the page is not threats, so you don't need a lot of detail, but it does provide a nice background to the actual topic of your page: restoration.
3. You did a great job gathering primary literature references and compiling research presented in the literature. It would be easier for a general audience to understand the page, however, if you do a bit more synthesis and summarization. Currently, the sections on restoration read a bit more like a research paper than a Wikipedia page. Try removing the Author et al. citations and just use the numeric citations at the end of the sentence. Also, try giving more definitions in these sections. For example, the Fragmentation section starts with a result from a research project rather than a definition of fragmentation.
Overall, this is a great start to a new page. It is clear you did a lot of research and read many papers to bring all this information again. Thank you for adding this to Wikipedia! If you have any questions about my review or want me to read your page again, don't hesitate to message me!
Best wishes, Maggi
Picture of diver?
editbit random? better pic? Victuallers (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Maile66 (talk) 01:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
... that coral reef ecosystems are a great indicator of environmental health?ALT1:... that, due to the increased impact of climate change, coral reef ecosystems are suffering bleaching events and dying off substantially?ALT2:... that methods are being done to combat climate change and protect coral reef environments?- ALT3:... that coral reef restoration can include growing fragments of coral in nurseries, attached to frames (pictured) or lines?
Created/expanded by Payne266 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC).
- I have struck the original hooks, which were unsuitable, and added ALT3. I have also added Desertarun to the credits. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have also added Cwmhiraeth to the credits. Desertarun (talk) 08:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Its more than long enough and the hook is quite interesting. Its got good sources. I changed a word in the hook and added an image - which I think interesting. I spotted no close paraphrasing. The hook fact is there but it does take some study to realise. Nice work by Payne Desertaran, Cwmhiraeth and Krone035!. Victuallers (talk) 09:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Victuallers, please always subst: your DYK review icons, including DYKtick. When you don't, the bot doesn't know to move the review to the Approved page, and there's a further delay in promoting it to the main page. Thanks. (I've added subst: just now to save time.) BlueMoonset (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Thanks for the heads up I didn't know that - will do! Victuallers (talk) 07:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Atharvawadodkar (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mayaworthing, Margaretbhanna.
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)