Talk:Cornell Law School
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Revision
edithow does this page look —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cornell010 (talk • contribs)
- Don't copy text from a source, that is plagiarism. Use multiple sources to write an article.
- Always log in if you have an account.
- Always sign your comments. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 18:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- But, you have to admit the library section really blows.--Cornell010 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but you can't plagiarize. The library section should be expanded... just go through the source and rewrite the section (from scratch) around it. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering, if we cited the source, then would it still be plagiarism? I am asking this because, on some other wikipedia pages I have seen people copy from another source word for word, however, they cited it, and by citing it wouldn't we be recognizing the source, thus not commmitting plagiarism. Thanks.User:Cornell010 20:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you're mirroring content which has not been released under a Wikipedia-friendly license and you're not plagiarizing, but instead blatantly infringing on a copyright. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 20:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see.--Cornell010 20:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, I just re-wrote the Library section, however, I need help with using the same refernce more than once (citing it). I tried to learn from the main Cornell article, where this is done many times, however, I could not get it to work. User:Cornell010 17:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- First instance of the reference: <ref name='something'>{{cite whatever}}</ref>
- All instances after the first: <ref name='something' />
- The somethings have to be the same. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 21:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, I just re-wrote the Library section, however, I need help with using the same refernce more than once (citing it). I tried to learn from the main Cornell article, where this is done many times, however, I could not get it to work. User:Cornell010 17:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see.--Cornell010 20:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you're mirroring content which has not been released under a Wikipedia-friendly license and you're not plagiarizing, but instead blatantly infringing on a copyright. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 20:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering, if we cited the source, then would it still be plagiarism? I am asking this because, on some other wikipedia pages I have seen people copy from another source word for word, however, they cited it, and by citing it wouldn't we be recognizing the source, thus not commmitting plagiarism. Thanks.User:Cornell010 20:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but you can't plagiarize. The library section should be expanded... just go through the source and rewrite the section (from scratch) around it. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Admissions numbers
editThere seems to be a problem with the admissions percentages, as the 583 number is the TOTAL number of J.D. students at Cornell. CLS class cohorts are typically 180-200 students in size. So, the applicants compete to be one of the roughly 180-200 students entering in a particular year, not one of 500-600. I'll wait to hear some debate on this, but I will change the numbers soon. Masonpatriot 18:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think the editor also combined yield and acceptance into one mostly useless statistic. —mercuryboardtalk 18:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Introduction
editThe introduction of this article is in desperate need of citations. I know that many of these pages are written/edited by students/alums/administration, but the introduction reads like an advertisement, with nothing to back up many of the boasts. Rms869 (talk) 08:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Assessment
editNeeds WP:MOS work to get to B class. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Drive-by tagging
editLots of WP:BOOSTERISM. —Notyourbroom (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Notable faculty
editThis section was padded out with several people who lacked a Wikipedia article to back the assertion of notability. Please see this edit for the specific list of names I removed. Note that I am not asserting that these people are non-notable. In the absence of corroboration within Wikipedia, however, I am erring on the side of a purge of the section, as is standard practice in these cases. —Bill Price(notyourbroom) 00:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Are any on your list notable as of late 9 years later? It would be nice to find any attorney after 12yrs of searching. Especially in the field of Appeal Fraud and Slander For Mentally Incompetent after writing my own opening brief and being denied due process and the denied freedom of speech in court. Also I was denied the right to defend liberty; asserted in appellate court. And denied reciept of mail and habeas corpus for want of Bail CA Penal Code 1490 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C51:7001:200:CBF:65BD:2D59:389 (talk) 04:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cornell Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130615185120/http://cornellsun.com/node/49072 to http://cornellsun.com/node/49072
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The JD/Master en Droit lasts four-years and prepares graduates for admission to the bar in the United States and in France. The JD/M.LL.P is three years and conveys a mastery of German and European law and practices. The JD/Master in Global Business Law lasts three years. Needs a citation to prove that the JD/Masters program actually offers undergraduates this opportunity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcush99 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
The JD/Master en Droit lasts four-years and prepares graduates for admission to the bar in the United States and in France. The JD/M.LL.P is three years and conveys a mastery of German and European law and practices. The JD/Master in Global Business Law lasts three years. Needs a citation to prove that the JD/Masters program actually offers undergraduates this opportunity. Bcush99 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Citation needed for Statistic
editThe citation was needed for "The JD/Master en Droit lasts four-years and prepares graduates for admission to the bar in the United States and in France. The JD/M.LL.P is three years and conveys a mastery of German and European law and practices. The JD/Master in Global Business Law lasts three years", there legally needs to be a source from the Law School to prove that this statistic is true for undergraduates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcush99 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Two alumni lists — is one sufficient?
editShouldn't the Cornell Law School#Notable alumni section listings be incorporated into the linked main article: List of Cornell University alumni? Two lists seems redundant and unnecessary. The section might be better edited along the lines of Berkeley School of Law#alumni and the List of UC Berkeley School of Law alumni articles. (I also left this note at Talk:University of Pennsylvania Law School# Two alumni lists —is one sufficient? in late August.) Thanks, Lindenfall (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
History of Cornell Law School
editWhen Andrew Dickson White began to lay plans for the law department at Cornell University, he wrote that he wanted to educate "not swarms of hastily prepared pettifoggers, but a fair number of well-trained, large-minded, morally-based lawyers in the best sense... "He hoped graduates of the school would become "a blessing to the country, at the bar, on the bench, and in various public bodies.
The Cornell Law School Employment
editApproximately 92% of the class of 2022 obtained full-time, long-term, JD-required employment within ten months of graduation. According to Reuters, Cornell Law placed a greater portion of its 2022 graduation in association positions at big law firm than any other law school in the United States. Of the graduating class of New teacher well sale any time and find out this make and out law in Cornell school and about well be come on this site and all time very special and fight well be right and has been new and double touch in this make and all time very special and all time allow all students and will be come on this all country students and all well be come on this site and has been new well be right about this site One teacher price in 2 L. to 4 L. and all students fees price in 95780 to 120580 all student and all time very special well be come on this site and allow well be bring has been new and all time after well be come.