Talk:County Route 168 (Sullivan County, New York)

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic USRD GA audit
Former good articleCounty Route 168 (Sullivan County, New York) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 16, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:County Route 168 (Sullivan County, New York)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. Place a request for a shield of the route
  2. Try to get a map of the route for the infobox
  3. Replace "along the aqueduct" with "on Roebling's Delaware Aqueduct"
  4. In lead, do not need to indicate route is in Minisink Ford besides the first sentence
  5. In first sentence of route description, remove words from parentheses and place comma after "Aqueduct"
  6. Do not need Minisink Ford Road italicized
  7. "un-manned" should not be hyphenated
  8. Minisink Battleground Road does not need to be italicized either
  9. Replace "residential homes" with residences"
  10. Replace "After those few homes" with "Past the residential area"
  11. Clarify "keyed-access"
  12. This article is about CR 168. Is it nessecary to list too much information about the history of Minisink Battleground County Park?
  13. Try to find a little more history about the actual road itself
  14. Is the mileage for the NY 97 intersection known?
  15. In the major intersections table, I would suggest listing the NY 97 junction as either one entry with a notation indicating a short concurrency or as two entries indicating the western and eastern ends of the concurrency

I am placing the article on hold Dough4872 (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Most done. As for the history, CR 168's only purpose is to serve the Park, and probably the reason for designation.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 20:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

USRD GA audit

edit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply