Talk:Courtallam

Courtalam vs. Courtallam, is splitting required ?

In the 2011 census two places are reported out for Tenkasi taluk beginning with Courtal, namely: Courtalam (TP) and Courtallam. Courtalam (TP) is reported as having a 2011 population of 2,160, while Courtallam is reported as having a 2011 population of 3,070. It appears that the village is larger than the panchayat town, and that this article has conflated the two of them. It appears from the Tenkasi entry in the National Panchayat Directory] that the individual villages in Tenkasi taluk have not been mapped out. Unfortunately, neither "Courtalam" nor ""Courtallam" appear there as panchayat villages. The Tirunelveli District website mentions a Courtallam Township Act, 1954 (Tamil Nadu Act XVI of 1954), and has seven other mentions of "Courtallam", not counting refereneces to "Courtallam Falls". The only mentions of "Courtalam" (one-l) are one in the District Profile to the water falls of Courtalam and several in the irrigation section discussing rivers that use the one-l version for the falls, the "Courtalam Hills" and an undefined place. The District Profile uses the one-l and the two-l in the same paragraph. So its seems that Tirunelveli District usage is not consistent. The 2001 population finder found no listing for Village: "Courtalam" but found two entries for Village: "Courtallam" namely:

• Courtallam: 744 households, 2,842 people, 1,386 males, 1,456 females
• Courtallam Slopes R.F.: 7 households, 22 people, 8 males, 14 females

and one entry for Town: Courtalam, namely:

• Courtalam (TP): 496 households, 2,368 people, 964 males, 1,404 females

All of these were in Tenkasi taluk. So is seems that we should split the two articles based on consistent census data; however, it would be agreeable to have the ground relationship between the one-l version and the two-l version spelled out in a reliable source. --Bejnar (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

• A disambiguation page is not needed, as each could have a dab hatnote for the other. Currently Courtalam redirects to Courtallam. --Bejnar (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

• Earlier, there were two pages - Courtalam and Courtallam. Courtalam was merged with Courtallam (see page history of Courtalam). From available information it appears that Courtallam and Courtalam are the same place with two spellings. For the time being, there does not appear to be a specific need for a separate Courtalam page. - Chandan Guha (talk) 06:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
• As per above, no need of separate page. Redirects from Kutralam and Courtalam are good enough. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 04:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
• I would suggest a seperate page for Courtallam and Courtallam Falls. Ddineshk (talk, contribs) 09:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
• Yes, the article can be split into two. Coutrallam is a small village on in the Tenkasi district and has number of falls around it. Though each of the falls have individual names like Old Coutrallam falls, main falls, New coutrallam falls, Puli aruvi, sitraruvi, thenaruvi palzhathotta aruvi commonly they are all called as coutrallam. A split of the article i believe will give a clear picture to anyone who is referring to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srvna2443 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

In popular culture may be needed

Dear User:LogX, I undid the reversion for adding in popular culture after visiting pages such as Niagara Falls, Athirappilly Falls and many on Wikipedia itself, which contain information regarding the concerned place featuring in Film, Television and Literature as fiction or real. Hence User:Balablitz may be correct in adding the section. Also kindly see Category:Films by country of shooting location. Thank you. --14.99.78.104 (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

That's ok. But, if you pretend the topic to be in the article, please cite a source for that. --    L o g  X   18:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear User:LogX, this is good. WP:AGF, U could have made this point in talk page first and if no response, u could have revert then. I now add the section with source. Thank you. --14.99.78.104 (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Please go ahead! --    L o g  X   18:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear 14.99.78.104 and User:LogX , thanks for restoring the section.--Balablitz (talk) 19:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Courtallam/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

An encouraging start! The graphic images are pleasing, but in the current state, no more are needed. However, more references (specifically in-text citations), and content is needed though!! Try following this WP:WIAGA article as a guide. Good luck. Ncmvocalist 10:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 11:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Courtallam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121109104930/http://www.supergoodmovies.com/51150/tollywood/prabhas-mirchi-in-kutralam-news-details to http://www.supergoodmovies.com/51150/tollywood/prabhas-mirchi-in-kutralam-news-details

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)