Talk:Crazy Sexy Cancer

Untitled

This article is too opinionated to be acceptable under wikipedia's NPOV standard. It should simply give a factual background and a synopsis of the film, not an outpouring of praise for the film and film-maker, nor should it be a platform for their opinions. Consider:

She is still a young, beautiful, and talented woman; the only difference is she has cancer.

This line adds no factual value to the article. It is clearly just opinion, and is not cited.

Kris Carr is healed not through any medical treatments, but through the people she meets and through the experiences she has.

This line uses a loose definition of 'heal' that construes that she is literally healed, miraculously. Remove this line for being misleading/biased, or quote her directly with proper disclosure and citation.

Yoga becomes apart of her daily activities, and she soon begins to discover the healing power that yoga brings to mind, body, and spirit

The first clause of this sentence is acceptable, the rest is not, as it is, again, an opinion. Wikipedia is not a soap-box to lavish praise on a particular person or event.

Examples abound, especially in the Healing Narrative section.

I agree it is a puff piece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.243.141.213 (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crazy Sexy Cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101217114035/http://globepequot.com/individual_book_page.php?isbn13=9781599212319 to http://www.globepequot.com/individual_book_page.php?isbn13=9781599212319
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928043802/http://www.globepequot.com/special/crazysexytour.html to http://www.globepequot.com/special/crazysexytour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)