Talk:Creator deity
Latest comment: 11 months ago by 93.106.143.242 in topic The use of J and E as sources is accademically contested
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creator deity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
The use of J and E as sources is accademically contested
editThis article presents an extremely academically biased view of genesis in the bible it has been argued by scholars that genisis doesn’t have two creation myths but instead a single one that is told twice in variance as was common in other near eastern cultures of the time period this should be explained in the article that there are two views to this ps. before you bother me by asking me for a source just google it yourself! 93.106.143.242 (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)