Talk:Crime and Dissonance

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Crime and Dissonance/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll take this! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Fine
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Fine
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Fine
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Fine
	2c. it contains no original research.	Fine
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Fine
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Fine
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Fine
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Single fair-use image, adequate FUR
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Album's cover, clearly acceptable
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Comments

1

• Is this in British English or American?

  That's a good question. I generally try to use AmE since most topics I cover are American; however I don't speak it myself and now that you bring this up I'm wondering if there's even a particular reason for an album of Italian music to use it. I guess the record label is American but if you convince me one way or the other I'll scan through and standardise anything missing. GRAPPLE X 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

  I can do that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

• proto-sampledelica - Perhaps a link or something?

  Linked to sampling (music). Sampledelia exists but it's not in the best condition; should I go with it anyway? GRAPPLE X 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

  I'd link to Sampledelia, as it's a more relevant topic. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

2

• Fix the CN tag.

  Got it, thanks. GRAPPLE X 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

3

• Possible further sources:

Crime and Dissonance at Stylus Magazine

Already cited in 5 places. :P

ENNIO MORRICONE; Crime and Dissonance at The Stranger

Having a look now. GRAPPLE X 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Source spotchecks (based on this revision)

• FN1
  • A Dagored appears nowhere in the article. Otherwise checks out
  • B Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • C Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • D Checks out, no close paraphrasing
• FN5
  • A Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • B Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • C Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • D Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • E Having trouble with the first sentence. He says "more relevant", perhaps as a way to avoid the "unfortunate" kitsch that Morricone has become known for. Otherwise okay.
• FN8
  • A Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • B Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • C Checks out, no close paraphrasing
• FN11
  • A Checks out, no close paraphrasing
  • B Checks out, no close paraphrasing

Further discussion

• I'll let you deal with that before I do a source spotcheck. Holding. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
• Spotchecks after lunch. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Couple issues. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Did a little extra citing and rephrasing. I should probably get to bed soon though, it's nearly 8. :/ GRAPPLE X 06:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
      • No need to overwork yourself for this. Passing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crime and Dissonance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510075310/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/ennio-morricone/crime-and-dissonance.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/ennio-morricone/crime-and-dissonance.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)